<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>All models are wrong, some models are useful</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/23/all-models-are-wrong-some-models-are-useful.aspx</link><description>A collegue reminded me of one of my favorite "architecture" sayings yesterday, which I had on my door for a couple of years: 
 
 All models are wrong. Some models are useful 
 The point is that we don't create a model to be an exact replica of reality</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: All models are wrong, some models are useful</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/23/all-models-are-wrong-some-models-are-useful.aspx#4016553</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:21:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4016553</guid><dc:creator>Max</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m not sure if I agree that all models are wrong. A model is an abstraction in the sense that it doesn’t have all the details, but it doesn’t necessary make it wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We abstract away irrelevant details on purpose - to manage complexity of the problem we are trying to solve. &amp;nbsp;Whatever is true about the abstraction must be also true about any instance it represents. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course there is a danger of abstracting relevant to the problem details – in this case the model won’t represent the real problem, and as a result solution based on that model will be wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4016553" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: All models are wrong, some models are useful</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/23/all-models-are-wrong-some-models-are-useful.aspx#4014073</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:11:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4014073</guid><dc:creator>Alik Levin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot; All generalizations are false, including this one.&amp;quot; - Mark Twain &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTW, &amp;quot;models&amp;quot; quote you used in the beginning is just my mantra for life.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cool&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;alikl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4014073" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: All models are wrong, some models are useful</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/23/all-models-are-wrong-some-models-are-useful.aspx#4010337</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:09:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4010337</guid><dc:creator>Philip Best</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm pretty sure that saying originates in economics. Regardless, it accentuates the reality of our increasing digital world that most &amp;quot;things&amp;quot; we now create are drastic approximations of reality and scepticism/critical thinking are a necessity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4010337" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>