<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Comparing the MSTest and Nunit Frameworks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx</link><description>I haven't seen much information online comparing the similarities and differences between the Nunit and MSTest Frameworks. Here I will define the similarities and some of the differences. If there is anything else which you come upon, please do add it</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Comparing the MSTest and Nunit Frameworks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#10387145</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:54:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10387145</guid><dc:creator>bahar ghadami</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks,Actually [TestCleanUp] should be [TestCleanup] and &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[AssemblyCleanUp] should be [AssemblyCleanup].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10387145" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Comparing the MSTest and Nunit Frameworks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#10195060</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 05:49:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10195060</guid><dc:creator>Santosh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This might help:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unit testing frameworks: MSTest v/s NUnit @ &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://santats.blogspot.com/"&gt;http://santats.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10195060" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Comparing the MSTest and Nunit Frameworks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#10055506</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:12:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10055506</guid><dc:creator>M. Hol</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi. I&amp;#39;m wondering about why support for inheritance of test classes is still not supported?? I wrote a question about it on stackoverflow.com, perhaps somebody reads this and can answer it:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3523826/is-defining-testmethods-in-test-base-classes-not-supported-by-mstest"&gt;stackoverflow.com/.../is-defining-testmethods-in-test-base-classes-not-supported-by-mstest&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10055506" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Comparing the MSTest and Nunit Frameworks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#9938684</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:16:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9938684</guid><dc:creator>Subrahmanyam K</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Some major differences in MSTest compared to NUnit is that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Inheritance is not supported if the base class is in different assembly&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) ClassInitialize and ClassCleanup attribute methods MUST be static which enforces a lot of restriction in actually using those attributes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9938684" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Equivalent to dynamic test cases in MBunit also lacking</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#5773897</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:19:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5773897</guid><dc:creator>acyment</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;MBUnit's TestSuiteFixture is a TestClass than can be populated at runtime (e.g. by fetching data from files in folders). Only way I know of doing that with MSTest is by adding an MSBuild task that runs before project compilation, that generates source code (i.e. alla CodeSmith), that will later be compiled by CSC and finally detected as a test by MSTest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5773897" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Motley says: "Just use a batch file to run unit tests"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#4990396</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 05:05:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4990396</guid><dc:creator>Noticias externas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Summary Motley: Just use a batch file to execute unit tests - it&amp;amp;#39;s easy and quick. Maven: Use a unit&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4990396" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Motley says: "Just use a batch file to run unit tests"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#4990324</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 04:53:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4990324</guid><dc:creator>Progressive Development</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Summary Motley: Just use a batch file to execute unit tests - it's easy and quick. Maven: Use a unit&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4990324" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>NUnit now supports [AssemblyInitialize] and [AssemblyCleanUp]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#4111244</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 03:12:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4111244</guid><dc:creator>Ross Bradbury</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that [AssemblyInitialize] and &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[AssemblyCleanUp] in MSTest correspond to &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[SetUp] and [TearDown] in the [SetUpFixture] of NUnit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4111244" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>NUnit &amp;amp; MSTest working in harmony</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#2554169</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 01:10:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2554169</guid><dc:creator>Jess Chadwick</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Now, I'm not claiming to be anything remotely close to a Test-Driven Development expert - heck, I only&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2554169" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Comparing the MSTest and Nunit Frameworks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#2547072</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 16:57:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2547072</guid><dc:creator>sdhebert</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What is the MSTest equivilant of 'Explicit'. &amp;nbsp;The combination of Explicit and Category is extremely helpful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2547072" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>