<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows Performance Toolkit - Xperf</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2008/04/03/windows-performance-toolkit-xperf.aspx</link><description>I recently came across a very interesting profiling tool that is available in Vista SP1 and Server 08 called the Windows Performance Analyzer. You can use this tool to profile and diagnose different kinds of symptoms that the machine is experiencing.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Windows Performance Toolkit - Xperf</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2008/04/03/windows-performance-toolkit-xperf.aspx#9991078</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:27:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9991078</guid><dc:creator>aqua</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a way we can log per function execution time also using xperf ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV class=commentowner&gt;[ Using XPerf and the Sampled Profile event (i.e. xperf –on Stackwalk -Profile) and stack traces one can approximate the relative length of time in a particular function but it does not flag start/stop times for function entry and exit. -Tate ]&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9991078" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Windows Performance Analyzer Xperf</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2008/04/03/windows-performance-toolkit-xperf.aspx#9450297</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:49:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9450297</guid><dc:creator>mvpmagazine.net</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Windows Performance Analyzer Xperf&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9450297" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Windows Performance Analyzer Xperf</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2008/04/03/windows-performance-toolkit-xperf.aspx#9450294</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:47:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9450294</guid><dc:creator>mvpmagazine.net</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Windows Performance Analyzer Xperf&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9450294" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Performance Toolkit - Xperf</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2008/04/03/windows-performance-toolkit-xperf.aspx#8593530</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8593530</guid><dc:creator>Jay Patel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great Windows Performance Toolkit - Xperf article, it helped us to narrow down an issue on a Windows 2003 Server (high CPU usage all the time).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8593530" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tracking too many interrupts with my tablet PC</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2008/04/03/windows-performance-toolkit-xperf.aspx#8414648</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:07:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8414648</guid><dc:creator>OneNote Testing</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been very happy with my tablet once I scanned my fingerprint to &amp;amp;quot;calm down&amp;amp;quot; the fingerprint&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8414648" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Performance Toolkit - Xperf</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2008/04/03/windows-performance-toolkit-xperf.aspx#8396608</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:23:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8396608</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;yep - similar to kernrate. &amp;nbsp;Also, I could not get symbols to load with this tool, although they work with windbg and VS2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8396608" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Performance Toolkit - Xperf</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2008/04/03/windows-performance-toolkit-xperf.aspx#8375185</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:32:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8375185</guid><dc:creator>Abbas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This reminds me of kernrate . . &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8375185" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Interesting Finds: 2008.04.05</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2008/04/03/windows-performance-toolkit-xperf.aspx#8359294</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 06:19:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8359294</guid><dc:creator>gOODiDEA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;.NETFrameworkDesignStudioPublishedCountingProcessorsin.NET:TheProsandConsofFiveDif...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8359294" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Interesting Finds: 2008.04.05</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2008/04/03/windows-performance-toolkit-xperf.aspx#8359286</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 06:17:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8359286</guid><dc:creator>gOODiDEA.NET</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;.NET Framework Design Studio Published Counting Processors in .NET: The Pros and Cons of Five Different&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8359286" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Performance Toolkit - Xperf</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2008/04/03/windows-performance-toolkit-xperf.aspx#8357351</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8357351</guid><dc:creator>Ray Kinsella</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article - didn't know about this tool, had written my own in mixed mode assemblies. This looks cool though - kudos.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8357351" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>