http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2009/01/09/challenges-of-debugging-optimized-x64-code.aspxIf you have not had the luxury of debugging optimized x64 code as of yet, don’t wait much longer and fall behind the times! &#160; Due to the x64 fastcall-like calling convention coupled with the abundance of general purpose registers, finding variableen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2009/01/09/challenges-of-debugging-optimized-x64-code.aspx#10207900Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:07:37 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10207900ColinDNZ<p>As the bot 2 comments say the 1st link has been deleted, what about changing the ARTICLE</p> <p>[Sorry Colin.&nbsp; Since this article was published we have changed the back end software for the site, making this edit non-trivial without also damaging the formatting of the article.]</p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10207900" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2009/01/09/challenges-of-debugging-optimized-x64-code.aspx#10136356Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:20:26 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10136356Ange<p>can you check the 1st link ? &#39;This content has been removed.&#39;</p> <p>[Thank you for bringing this to our attention.&nbsp; MSDN re-wrote that content, you can find equivalent information at <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7kcdt6fy.aspx">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7kcdt6fy.aspx</a>]</p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10136356" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2009/01/09/challenges-of-debugging-optimized-x64-code.aspx#10136259Thu, 03 Mar 2011 01:18:30 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10136259Cheong<p>Sorry, I found the link to MSDN ms794533.aspx has been removed.</p> <p>What topic is that about?</p> <p>[Thank you for bringing this to our attention.&nbsp; MSDN re-wrote that content, you can find equivalent information at <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7kcdt6fy.aspx">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7kcdt6fy.aspx</a>]</p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10136259" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2009/01/09/challenges-of-debugging-optimized-x64-code.aspx#9436720Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:15:39 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9436720Yuhong Bao<p>BTW, the same challenges can happen when debugging LTCG-optimized x86 code.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9436720" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2009/01/09/challenges-of-debugging-optimized-x64-code.aspx#9350037Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:11:21 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9350037Pushkar Prasad<p>Thanks Trey. This is insightful. I have attended training related to unassembly and still I always loose track, but now I can save this as a cube note for reference.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9350037" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2009/01/09/challenges-of-debugging-optimized-x64-code.aspx#9308094Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:32:50 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9308094Marc Sherman<P>Very informative!!</P> <P>thank you</P><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9308094" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ntdebugging/archive/2009/01/09/challenges-of-debugging-optimized-x64-code.aspx#9304363Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:14:41 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9304363EdZ<P>This is a great introduction to bridge the gap for those who are familiar with x86 debugging and are trying to make the jump to x64 debugging. Having done some x86 debugging and having limited time to spend learning new techniques for x64, this detailed and well documented example, is an excellent start!</P> <DIV class=commentowner>[Thanks for the great feedback, EdZ!]</DIV><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9304363" width="1" height="1">