<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windowless controls are not magic</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/02/11/371042.aspx</link><description>They take a lot of work, but they aren't magic.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Xobni Man Walking  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Reinventing Code</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/02/11/371042.aspx#1912103</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:14:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1912103</guid><dc:creator>Xobni Man Walking  » Blog Archive   » Reinventing Code</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.xobni.com/asmith/archives/23"&gt;http://blogs.xobni.com/asmith/archives/23&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1912103" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why do user interface actions tend to occur on the release, not on the press?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/02/11/371042.aspx#1306402</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 01:40:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1306402</guid><dc:creator>The Old New Thing</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It has its ups and downs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1306402" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why do user interface actions tend to occur on the release, not on the press?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/02/11/371042.aspx#1305525</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:56:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1305525</guid><dc:creator>The Old New Thing</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It has its ups and downs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1305525" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>C# Nuggets : WPF/E December 2006 CTP Released</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/02/11/371042.aspx#1207681</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 00:30:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1207681</guid><dc:creator>C# Nuggets : WPF/E December 2006 CTP Released</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://aspadvice.com/blogs/rbirkby/archive/2006/12/04/WPF_2F00_E-December-2006-CTP-Released.aspx"&gt;http://aspadvice.com/blogs/rbirkby/archive/2006/12/04/WPF_2F00_E-December-2006-CTP-Released.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1207681" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Accessibility is not just for people with disabilities</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/02/11/371042.aspx#702528</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:00:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:702528</guid><dc:creator>The Old New Thing</dc:creator><description>You'll probably use it too.&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=702528" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: What are Test Hooks?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/02/11/371042.aspx#397078</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:397078</guid><dc:creator>Sara Ford's WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=397078" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windowless controls are not magic</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/02/11/371042.aspx#375196</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:375196</guid><dc:creator>Chris Becke</dc:creator><description>User32 IS a GUI toolkit. What is this obsession with running off and writing windowless controls anyway. I mean - &amp;quot;proper&amp;quot; windowed controls implement a certain set of functionality that contributes to their heavyweightness.  Any full featured windowless control is surely going to have re-implemented enough of that to be heavy all over again?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, is the core Win32 windowing system so ossified that it couldnt be lightened up? Why ARE we worried about user32 handle limits still?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=375196" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windowless controls are not magic</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/02/11/371042.aspx#373999</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:373999</guid><dc:creator>Dan McCarty</dc:creator><description>KiwiBlue: Actually, Access 2.0 created its forms by rendering the form's controls at run-time into an on-screen bitmap.  It then used two on-screen lightweight controls to (convincingly) imitate the control that currently had focus.  Since Access 2.0 originally ran on Win 3.1, what they were able to accomplish on 16-bit Windows was pretty advanced at the time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm waxing a bit off-topic, but FWIW, Access 2.0 had one of the finest forms designers I've ever seen.  It was a pleasure to work with. Kudos to the original team.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(For the record, I spent way too of my life developing for Access 2.0.)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=373999" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windowless controls are not magic</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/02/11/371042.aspx#373998</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:373998</guid><dc:creator>Dan McCarty</dc:creator><description>KiwiBlue: Actually, Access 2.0 created its forms by rendering the form's controls at run-time into an on-screen bitmap.  It then used two on-screen lightweight controls to (convincingly) imitate the control that currently had focus.  Since Access 2.0 originally ran on Win 3.1, what they were able to accomplish on 16-bit Windows was pretty advanced at the time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm waxing a bit off-topic, but FWIW, Access 2.0 had one of the finest forms designers I've ever seen.  It was a pleasure to work with. Kudos to the original team.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(For the record, I spent way too of my life developing for Access 2.0.)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=373998" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windowless controls are not magic</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/02/11/371042.aspx#372663</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:372663</guid><dc:creator>Brad Baker</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;People in this discussion mentioned &amp;quot;clipping&amp;quot; the select field area when moving a higher z-order DIV over a select field.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can they please expand on this and the general approached used?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=372663" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>