<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Where did the name for Microsoft Access come from?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2006/04/13/575739.aspx</link><description>It was already taken, but that's okay.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>FuzzyBlog  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; 11 Minutes of Link Blogging</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2006/04/13/575739.aspx#582029</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:35:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:582029</guid><dc:creator>FuzzyBlog  » Blog Archive   » 11 Minutes of Link Blogging</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://fuzzyblog.com/archives/2006/04/24/11-minutes-of-link-blogging/"&gt;http://fuzzyblog.com/archives/2006/04/24/11-minutes-of-link-blogging/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=582029" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Where did the name for Microsoft Access come from?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2006/04/13/575739.aspx#578400</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:45:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:578400</guid><dc:creator>F00sh</dc:creator><description>haha, I like how in that link to the 1984 Apple Add, where it says: &amp;quot;Business Graphics Before Macintosh&amp;quot;.. its just a blank screen.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=578400" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Where did the name for Microsoft Access come from?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2006/04/13/575739.aspx#577113</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:21:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:577113</guid><dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator><description>SamT: Multiplan and Chart were released in 1984 for the Mac; Excel 1.0 was released for Mac in 1985.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check out &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://toastbucket.com/apple1984ad/p08.html"&gt;http://toastbucket.com/apple1984ad/p08.html&lt;/a&gt; for an ad showing the two early pieces of software.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know for sure if Excel was based on the Multiplan codebase or if it was a complete rewrite, but the people who wrote it also worked on Multiplan, so it's almost like saying that Windows 95 was the result of a merger between DOS and Windows.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=577113" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Where did the name for Microsoft Access come from?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2006/04/13/575739.aspx#576884</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:33:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:576884</guid><dc:creator>Inigo Montoya</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;the name seems to have been just fortuitous ...&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;I think it fortuitously lost all the old baggage ...&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You keep using that word. &amp;nbsp;I do not think it means what you think it means.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(actually, I think it does, but I couldn't resist making the reference...)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=576884" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Where did the name for Microsoft Access come from?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2006/04/13/575739.aspx#576307</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:45:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:576307</guid><dc:creator>SamT</dc:creator><description>Have to agree with Phil Wilson, the name seems to have been just fortuitous that Microsoft already had the trademark for &amp;quot;Microsoft Access.&amp;quot; Got to say that the the program was so popular that after living on Word 4, Word 5, Word 6 (for DOS) that I can only recall looking at those Green Microsoft folders but can't recall having ever used the program.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gabe: If Excel had 1st released for DOS it may have made life as a Multiplan/Chart merge but 1st releasing as a Mac only (there was a MultiPlan/Chart for the Mac?) I think it fortuitously lost all the old baggage (and picked up some memory hungry ones)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Love these digging into the past articles.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=576307" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Where did the name for Microsoft Access come from?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2006/04/13/575739.aspx#576195</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 05:35:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:576195</guid><dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator><description>Speaking of Multiplan, I seem to recall that Excel was actually the result of a merger between Multiplan and Chart. Does anybody know why they came up with a new name?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=576195" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Where did the name for Microsoft Access come from?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2006/04/13/575739.aspx#576099</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:56:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:576099</guid><dc:creator>Phil Wilson</dc:creator><description>I don't know if this was a factor in the Access case, but it's a lot less fuss legally (registering trademarked names etc) and probably speedier to use an old trademarked dusty name that your company still owns that applies to a long dead product. Rumor has it that my company chose its name (Unisys) for that reason. &lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=576099" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Where did the name for Microsoft Access come from?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2006/04/13/575739.aspx#575958</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:24:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:575958</guid><dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator><description>I'm looking forward to the MultiPlan product launch...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=575958" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Where did the name for Microsoft Access come from?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2006/04/13/575739.aspx#575923</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:24:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:575923</guid><dc:creator>Tim Smith</dc:creator><description>HyperTerminal existed for a long time as a 3rd party application before MS licensed it.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=575923" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Where did the name for Microsoft Access come from?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2006/04/13/575739.aspx#575810</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:01:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:575810</guid><dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator><description>Oh, it's such a chore to move to and from c:\windows to c:\windows\system.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=575810" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>