<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Paolo Salvatori's Blog - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/paolos/</link><description>Adventures in the magic world of BizTalk Server, WCF and Azure.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Service Bus Explorer 2.0 released</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/paolos/archive/2013/04/12/service-bus-explorer-2-0-released.aspx#10413182</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:58:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10413182</guid><dc:creator>Frank Boucher</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Impressive tool that gives a lot of options to manage our Azure Service Bus.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.frankysnotes.com/2013/04/reading-notes-91.html"&gt;www.frankysnotes.com/.../reading-notes-91.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10413182" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: How to use Windows Azure Table Storage in Windows Azure Mobile Services</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/paolos/archive/2013/04/09/how-to-use-windows-azure-table-storage-in-windows-azure-mobile-services.aspx#10409650</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:48:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10409650</guid><dc:creator>Paolo Salvatori</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah ah ah... nice comment Erik ;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10409650" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: How to use Windows Azure Table Storage in Windows Azure Mobile Services</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/paolos/archive/2013/04/09/how-to-use-windows-azure-table-storage-in-windows-azure-mobile-services.aspx#10409632</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:04:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10409632</guid><dc:creator>ErikEJ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Too much Javascript, my head hurts...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10409632" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: BizTalk Server and Protocol Transition</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/paolos/archive/2009/01/20/biztalk-server-and-protocol-transition.aspx#10370174</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:46:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10370174</guid><dc:creator>Margaux</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Paolo,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Based on your sources, I have revised scenario using HTTP and message security. However, for Scenario 2, the WinForm receives &amp;quot;The message could not be processedd. This is most likely because the action &amp;#39;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://Microsoft.BizTalk.Rangers.ProtocolTransition.HelloWorld/IHelloWorld/SayHello&amp;#39;"&gt;microsoft.biztalk.rangers.protocoltransition.helloworld/.../SayHello&amp;&lt;/a&gt; is incorrect or because the message contains an invalid or expired security context token or because there is a mismatch between bindings. The security context token would be invalid if the service aborted the channel due to inactivity. To prevent the service from aborting idle sessions prematurely increase the Receive timeout on the service endpoint&amp;#39;s binding.&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After changing the custom binding of &amp;quot;Solicit Response WCF-Custom Send Port&amp;quot; to wsHttpBinding (with message security)&amp;quot;, the WinForm can receive the exact response message from BizTalk server. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you have any ideas what&amp;#39;s the fact I could have missed for using HTTP and custom binding (with message security)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rgds,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Margaux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10370174" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: BizTalk Server and Protocol Transition</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/paolos/archive/2009/01/20/biztalk-server-and-protocol-transition.aspx#10369460</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 03:05:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10369460</guid><dc:creator>Margaux</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Paolo,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of using &amp;quot;HTTPS&amp;quot;, is it okay to use &amp;quot;HTTP&amp;quot; for the whole implementation? The reason for this is due to Figure 9, I.e. one of the binding element is &amp;quot;HttpsTransport&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Should the solution will be implemented by HTTP, may I have your advice on the necessary changes on the CustomBinding component.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rgds,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Margaux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10369460" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: BizTalk Server and Protocol Transition</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/paolos/archive/2009/01/20/biztalk-server-and-protocol-transition.aspx#10368581</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:04:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10368581</guid><dc:creator>Margaux</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Paolo,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for keep updating this post. Is it possible to impersonate the original caller authenticated with the Windows Integrated security at the message level? I f yes, it is much appreciate if you can advise the necessary changes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10368581" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: How to Boost Performance of the ESB Routing and Transform Services – Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/paolos/archive/2010/07/07/how-to-boost-performance-of-the-esb-routing-and-transform-services-part-1.aspx#10365723</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:54:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10365723</guid><dc:creator>Paolo Salvatori</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Sreeni,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks for the compliments. Try one of the following links and let me know!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://sdrv.ms/U3tUgo"&gt;http://sdrv.ms/U3tUgo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://sdrv.ms/U3tTce"&gt;http://sdrv.ms/U3tTce&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ciao,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Paolo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10365723" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Large Message Transfer with WCF-Adapters Part 2</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/paolos/archive/2010/09/09/large-message-transfer-with-wcf-adapters-part-2.aspx#10365720</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:48:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10365720</guid><dc:creator>Paolo Salvatori</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Asim, thanks for the compliments, if you mean a sample of a WCF service that uses the sqlBinding to poll data from a SQL Server database without using BizTalk, you can look at this sample I made a few years ago. Beware, this is a quick and dirty sample, but it should work. :) The sample is called WCFSQLService and you can download it here &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://sdrv.ms/YHXhJZ"&gt;http://sdrv.ms/YHXhJZ&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ciao,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Paolo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10365720" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Large Message Transfer with WCF-Adapters Part 2</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/paolos/archive/2010/09/09/large-message-transfer-with-wcf-adapters-part-2.aspx#10365333</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 18:16:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10365333</guid><dc:creator>Asim</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Paolo,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Really excellent article, you said in your remarks that we can have a pure WCF solution by removing BizTalk from the picture. I was wondering if you have any example code where you used pure WCF solution with SQL server. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards from France.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Asim&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10365333" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: How to Boost Performance of the ESB Routing and Transform Services – Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/paolos/archive/2010/07/07/how-to-boost-performance-of-the-esb-routing-and-transform-services-part-1.aspx#10365271</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:45:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10365271</guid><dc:creator>Sreeni</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent article. Dynamic behavior without dynamic hosts - best of both worlds. I am planning to leverage it in my current application. I see that code link is returning &amp;quot;Forbidden&amp;quot; message. Can you please update or send me source code listed in this site?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10365271" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>