Since architecture is a viable approach into analysing and designing many areas like city structure, buildings, businesses and ICT, could one use the approach to analyse the constituent parts of a photographic piece of art? To come up with an architected photograph?
What is then architecture? Traditional definition is the art and science of designing buildings and structures. In ICT and business, it's similarly about structure and principles governing the design of business and ICT. Structure can be different business and ICT services and their relations to each other. So architecture is both art and discipline.
Architecture is also about separation of concerns. Separating the WHY from WHAT, HOW and WITH WHAT. Each level of abstraction has concerns that are best understood by keeping them separate:
WHY do I photograph? What is the context of my photographs? Some do it as a profession, preferably getting both material and intellectual reward out of it. Some may photograph as a way to express emotions, as a form of therapy. Some photograph for themselves, never actually sharing their work outside a close circle. Some are driven by competition and the desire for recognition. I guess the whole field of photography and the related forms of art are also part of the context. Even if I'm not aware of all of them, they do still influence how people interpret my photos. Contextual elements for a photograph could be:
WHAT should a photograph aim to achieve? Naturally the context of the photograph influences this decision. What is the equivalent of business or ICT service in a photograph? If we think photography as communication and influencing, then the service is the affect we desire to achieve. A list of conceptual 'services' could be:
(I know the word affector is not proper English, I’m open to suggestions.)
HOW should we then achieve the desired affects? The photographer needs to select one or more concrete subjects to represent the conceptual subject. The background may be chosen to support the affect. The affect is further modified by other logical elements and the composition between them.Logical elements of photograph could be:
WITH WHAT can we then implement the physical photograph? Here we should consider the technicalities of making a photograph. Everything from the time of capture, lights used, lens, exposure, media and processing to the delivery media of the final photograph. Thus the physical or implementation elements of a photograph could be:
In business and ICT architecture, best results are achieved when all four abstraction levels are mastered. I’d say the same holds true for great photographs. And I have lot to learn on Photography!
Image copyright Pasi Mäkinen, unauthorised reproduction prohibited.