<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Accountants Don't Use Erasers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/pathelland/archive/2007/06/14/accountants-don-t-use-erasers.aspx</link><description>Many kinds of computing are "append-only". By that, I mean that observations about the world are recorded in perpetuity. Derived results from those observations may be calculated on demand (or kept as a running tally) but you can't rewrite history. I</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Microsoft Tech.Ed 2007 - Day #2</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/pathelland/archive/2007/06/14/accountants-don-t-use-erasers.aspx#5939762</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:59:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5939762</guid><dc:creator>Hugo Ribeiro</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sessions: ARC207 - Putting the User Back into Architecture (Simon Guest) WEB305 - &amp;amp;quot;IronPython&amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5939762" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thoughts about Multi-Master Replication of Tree-Structured Data</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/pathelland/archive/2007/06/14/accountants-don-t-use-erasers.aspx#4470039</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:22:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4470039</guid><dc:creator>Noticias externas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;amp;#39;ve been enthusiastic about ideas around independent updates to trees of data (e.g. XML or XAML&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4470039" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thoughts about Multi-Master Replication of Tree-Structured Data</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/pathelland/archive/2007/06/14/accountants-don-t-use-erasers.aspx#4469691</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 01:48:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4469691</guid><dc:creator>PatHelland's WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been enthusiastic about ideas around independent updates to trees of data (e.g. XML or XAML documents)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4469691" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pat Helland - Accountants Don't Use Erasers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/pathelland/archive/2007/06/14/accountants-don-t-use-erasers.aspx#3654503</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 05:33:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3654503</guid><dc:creator>Toadkillerdog's DogHouse</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pat Helland's got a fascinating post on his blog called &amp;quot;Accountants Don't Use Erasers.&amp;quot; It's a must...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3654503" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>