<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Controllers and Doers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/pathelland/archive/2008/07/06/controllers-and-doers.aspx</link><description>First of all, I've put off writing this for a while since I wanted a term for "controllers" that does not feel pejorative. I really mean this characteristic in a healthy and natural fashion! 
 So, it's my belief that the people working in IT fall into</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Controllers and Doers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/pathelland/archive/2008/07/06/controllers-and-doers.aspx#8700253</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:08:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8700253</guid><dc:creator>lcharold@hotmail.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Names do matter, after all. They help us visualize and make concrete otherwise abstract concepts.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I read the name Controllers as pejorative more because of its contrast with Doers - as in Controllers are Non-Doers. And I don't think that's what you mean.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perhaps what you're describing is the tension between the Idealists vs. the Pragmatists?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lee&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8700253" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>