SQL Server 2008 (aka Katmai) allows seamless transition between relational and nonrelational data, enabling users to access documents as data, encode complex XML hierarchies within XML, and query across relational and text data. So how is this achieved?
There is a new FileStream data type which allows large binary data to be stored in the file system and yet remain an integral part of the database with transactional consistency. And yes, you read correct: with transactional consistency!
This enables scale-out of large binary data to be managed by the database and yet stored on cheaper storage and file systems.
Applications can use a new storage type “VARBINARY(MAX) FILESTREAM” to define table columns and store large binary data as files in the file system instead of as a SQL BLOB. Applications can use T-SQL SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statements to query and modify FILESTREAM data.
The FILESTREAM type leverages Win32 rich set of streaming APIs which is proven to be more efficient and faster the larger the data gets.
More on this and other new features of SQL Server 2008 later!
In the meantime, if you are thirsty to see more, then why not downloading the first Community Technology Preview (CTP) of SQL Server 2008 from here or here?
Oh, and if you haven’t guessed by now, Katmai is the code name for SQL Server 2008.
With the covers coming off the SQL Server 2008 (Katmai) I have been looking at how this may impact on
I guess your comment was around scale out effects of Katmai with SharePoint. As far as I know, the SharePoint team are in direct contact with the FileStream guys...
I'd like to know if the FILESTREAM type will be supported in the Express version, and if files stored in this manor will count towards the 4GB database limit. I could picture using this for large files, 100MB+, but then we would reach the 4GB limit quickly.
I'd also be happy if they added something like this, but that wasn't part of the database, just a way to use the SQL connection to transfer files to/from the server's file system -- without having to install an additional server component (like HTTP or FTP).
So, Rick , Jacob , Adam and Elaine have all given their impressions. I guess I should chime in. The thing
do you know if it's possible to implement filestream for existing sites? can we upgrade SQL turn on filestream and then configure an existing application?