<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>COM in UMDF</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/peterwie/archive/2006/09/15/650813.aspx</link><description>UMDF defines all of its interfaces using COM interfaces, rather than the flat C-style DDI that the KMDF team used.  When kernel developers see this their first question is often "why did you do that?" and it's an understandable question. I had a long</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator></channel></rss>