Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4.0 CTP now available!

Parallel Programming with NET Visual Studio 2010 and NET Framework | porch swing

Parallel Programming with NET Visual Studio 2010 and NET Framework | porch swing — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:17:22 GMT

PingBack from http://fancyporchswing.info/story.php?id=2532

Parallel Programming with NET Visual Studio 2010 and NET Framework | Quick Diets

Parallel Programming with NET Visual Studio 2010 and NET Framework | Quick Diets — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:24:36 GMT

PingBack from http://quickdietsite.info/story.php?id=13536

Parallel Programming with NET Visual Studio 2010 and NET Framework | Toe Nail Fungus

Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:23:15 GMT

PingBack from http://toenailfungusite.info/story.php?id=8891

re: Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4.0 CTP now available!

Tanveer Badar — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:57:56 GMT

@ toub

Although, I haven't checked the parallel extensions library myself and I am not even aware of the complete interface Task class exposes, can you not implement IDisposable on it?

In this manner, when Dispose is called it throws any accumulated exceptions. Deterministic behavior, also if you call Dispose either directly or through using( ) it signifies you care about the exceptions otherwise, simply continue executing.

.NET Framework 4.0 Base Class Library újdonságok

Hírcsatorna — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:16:53 GMT

A BCL csapat közzétette azokat az új képességeket, amiket a várhatóan ez év második felében megjelenő

re: Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4.0 CTP now available!

Driesie — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:18:22 GMT

As a few comments above.

Does this mean the Parallel Extensions library preview will not be available anymore on its own?

I think this would be a real shame. I have too been playing around and experimenting with the previous CTPs and the great thing is I can just reference to the DLLs from existing projects. I don't like the idea of only being able to play with this as part of the Visual Studio 10 preview.

Capharna??m #6 « Yet Another [a compl??ter]

Capharna??m #6 « Yet Another [a compl??ter] — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:36:06 GMT

PingBack from http://garuma.wordpress.com/2008/11/07/capharnaum-6/

What's New in the BCL in .NET 4.0 [Justin Van Patten]

BCL Team Blog — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:28:25 GMT

The Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4.0 CTP is available for download as of last week. The CTP

re: Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4.0 CTP now available!

Stephen Toub - MSFT — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:30:33 GMT

Tanveer, it's a good question. On the one hand, we want to support marshaling unhandled exceptions within a task out of call sites to wait on a task; this is similar to how exceptions from an Asynchronous Programming Model (APM) implementation propagate out of a call to EndXx. However, there's a problem with the APM pattern, in that if you don't call EndXx, you never see the exception. Similarly, with tasks, if you didn't call Task.Wait or Future.Value or accessed Task.Exception or so forth, you would never observe the exception that went unhandled. To ensure that excepts are not ignored but to still enable exceptions to be marshaled from asynchronous invocation back out to a thread that waits on a task, we've opted for this new model where we track whether unhandled exceptions are observed, and if they're never observed (which we know will be the case if the exception wasn't observed and the task gets GC'd), we then rethrow it so that it can't be ignored; by default, this will bring down the process. That behavior is in keeping with .NET's behavior since 2.0, where unhandled exceptions crash the default host by default.

Using Hyper-V with the Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4.0 CTP

Parallel Programming with .NET — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 09:41:51 GMT

Last week, we posted about the availability of the Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4.0 CTP , which