<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Stored procedure recompile caused by alter table on temp table</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2011/07/15/stored-procedure-recompile-caused-by-alter-table-on-temp-table.aspx</link><description>Lately we got a customer who called in and reported&amp;#160; that a particular statement involving a temp table always got recompiled and caused performance problems.&amp;#160;&amp;#160; We have a KB article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/243586 &amp;#160; which documents</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Stored procedure recompile caused by alter table on temp table</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2011/07/15/stored-procedure-recompile-caused-by-alter-table-on-temp-table.aspx#10245360</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 02:17:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10245360</guid><dc:creator>M. Kokoy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;How about creating an index on the temp table inside SP, will be recompile as well?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10245360" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Stored procedure recompile caused by alter table on temp table</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2011/07/15/stored-procedure-recompile-caused-by-alter-table-on-temp-table.aspx#10187093</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:32:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10187093</guid><dc:creator>Paul White</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting, Jack. &amp;nbsp;But why? &amp;nbsp;Is this a bug, limitation, or deliberate design?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Paul&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10187093" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>