<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Usability</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/pstubbs/archive/2003/08/11/56153.aspx</link><description>Third Week at Microsoft</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>RE: Usability</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/pstubbs/archive/2003/08/11/56153.aspx#56155</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 02:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:56155</guid><dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator><description>Hmmm.  What's the point of the two-way mirror?  I have heard of other places, obviously not as advanced as Microsoft, that use a one-way mirror for useability studies.  I guess the drawback is that only the users are able to gaze at their reflections while working.  Maybe the other places think that tech people don't check their hair as often as your general user.  Are Microsoft developers especially vain, do you find?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=56155" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Usability</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/pstubbs/archive/2003/08/11/56153.aspx#56154</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:56154</guid><dc:creator>Melissa R</dc:creator><description>You must be VERY busy as it's been quite a while since the last post. Sounds like things are going well.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=56154" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>