<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Something About Lies and Statistics...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ptorr/archive/2006/06/01/613731.aspx</link><description>CNet is running a story about reader reaction to the new Windows Media Photo format . From the fine article :
 In an unscientific poll asking whether a JPEG competitor is needed, almost half of the 5,621 voters said maybe, "but I'm concerned about it</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Something About Lies and Statistics...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ptorr/archive/2006/06/01/613731.aspx#618527</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 04:24:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:618527</guid><dc:creator>MSDNArchive</dc:creator><description>One of the recent episodes of &amp;quot;Penn &amp;amp; Teller: Bullshit&amp;quot; on Showtime titled &amp;quot;Numbers&amp;quot; went into a lot of detail about how polls are usually crafted to get the results they want, and how numbers can be skewed. &amp;nbsp;Very interesting to watch if you can find it on TV.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=618527" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Something About Lies and Statistics...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ptorr/archive/2006/06/01/613731.aspx#613915</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:45:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:613915</guid><dc:creator>Peter Torr - MSFT</dc:creator><description>OK Josh, where do you want to meet up for your eye-poking apointment? :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But yeah, you can make a poll &amp;quot;prove&amp;quot; anything you want by selecting the right questions, the right audience, etc.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=613915" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Something About Lies and Statistics...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ptorr/archive/2006/06/01/613731.aspx#613902</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:28:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:613902</guid><dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator><description>No, I want you to poke me in the eye with a sharp stick. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's funny that you mention this b/c I was just reading an article about other public polls (like political polls, etc.) and how the pollsters can skew the numbers by engineering the questions.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=613902" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Something About Lies and Statistics...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ptorr/archive/2006/06/01/613731.aspx#613900</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:28:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:613900</guid><dc:creator>Dean Harding</dc:creator><description>The other thing I would question is whether the readers actually UNDERSTAND what is wrong with JPEG in the first place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some people even seemed concerned about some sort of DRM in the file, but I had a quick look at the spec and it didn't seem to contain anything like that... I guess that's just a knee-jerk reaction to anything new in &amp;quot;media&amp;quot; these days...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=613900" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>