A few folks are pushing back on Peter's petition for unit testing features in versions of Visual Studio other than the "Team System" versions. I think that Peter's request is not unreasonable, but as some other people have pointed out there are other options available for unit testing. Also, Mike G. comments that if you expect a new feature like this you should be willing to trade off other features (or have VS2005 ship later). I'm more concerned about the number of Visual Studio versions that we're going to have, as opposed to which features are contained in which versions. The confusion could be terrible if we maintain so many versions of the tools.