http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ricom/archive/2007/07/05/dlinq-linq-to-sql-performance-part-4.aspxWell it's high time I gave you some numbers for the new stuff. In the original benchmark the Linq version was running at 13.62% of the original time. And while I'm discussing that result, Sekiya Sato pointed out an error in my original benchmark (seeen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ricom/archive/2007/07/05/dlinq-linq-to-sql-performance-part-4.aspx#9059280Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:06:24 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9059280吴明浩<p>Heythere,backagain.InmyfirstpostaboutLINQItriedtoprovideabrief(okay,bitdetailed)in...</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9059280" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ricom/archive/2007/07/05/dlinq-linq-to-sql-performance-part-4.aspx#8740602Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:08:29 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8740602Wriju's BLOG<p>ADO.NET is our contemporary data access component and now we have written many applications. Now there</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8740602" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ricom/archive/2007/07/05/dlinq-linq-to-sql-performance-part-4.aspx#7365988Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:54:40 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7365988えムナウ Blog<p>re: Linq はすごい？ その７</p><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7365988" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ricom/archive/2007/07/05/dlinq-linq-to-sql-performance-part-4.aspx#5817461Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:31:47 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5817461Wriju's BLOG<p>Some of the best blogs on LINQ to SQL I found are available for great learning, Scott Guthrie The Famous</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5817461" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ricom/archive/2007/07/05/dlinq-linq-to-sql-performance-part-4.aspx#4588054Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:58:28 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4588054jankyBlog<p>Risorse su Linq to SQL</p><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4588054" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ricom/archive/2007/07/05/dlinq-linq-to-sql-performance-part-4.aspx#4547322Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:28:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4547322Ronan Geraghty's Weblog <p>I've been meaning to dig into LINQ performance for some time (actually since it came up during one of</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4547322" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ricom/archive/2007/07/05/dlinq-linq-to-sql-performance-part-4.aspx#4547321Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:28:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4547321MSDN Ireland Blog<p>I've been meaning to dig into LINQ performance for some time (actually since it came up during one of</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4547321" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ricom/archive/2007/07/05/dlinq-linq-to-sql-performance-part-4.aspx#4545113Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:03:12 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4545113MSDN Ireland Blog<p>I've been meaning to dig into LINQ performance for some time (actually since it came up during one of</p><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4545113" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ricom/archive/2007/07/05/dlinq-linq-to-sql-performance-part-4.aspx#4545112Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:03:11 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4545112Ronan Geraghty's Weblog <p>I've been meaning to dig into LINQ performance for some time (actually since it came up during one of</p><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4545112" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ricom/archive/2007/07/05/dlinq-linq-to-sql-performance-part-4.aspx#4364066Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:36:20 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4364066Charlie Calvert's Community Blog<p>There are several good new blogs from members of the community team. Nevertheless, the most important</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4364066" width="1" height="1">