<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>More on generic variance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rmbyers/archive/2006/06/01/613690.aspx</link><description>In my entry on generic variance in the CLR , I said that you can’t convert a List&amp;lt;String&amp;gt; to a List&amp;lt;Object&amp;gt;, or even an IEnumerable&amp;lt;String&amp;gt; to IEnumerable&amp;lt;Object&amp;gt;. I should point out however that the real-world scenarios where</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: More on generic variance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rmbyers/archive/2006/06/01/613690.aspx#9029132</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:21:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9029132</guid><dc:creator>Tanveer Badar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Although horribly outdated, but JIT didn't inline functions containing value type parameters or return value. JIT also maintained separate implementations for each distinct value type instantiation of generics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This shortcoming has been fixed as of .netfx 3.5 SP1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9029132" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>???????????????? ?????????? ?????????????????? ?? C# ?? Java &amp;laquo; Bits of Mind</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rmbyers/archive/2006/06/01/613690.aspx#8919176</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:30:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8919176</guid><dc:creator>???????????????? ?????????? ?????????????????? ?? C# ?? Java &amp;laquo; Bits of Mind</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bitsofmind.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/generic_variance_in_csharp_and_java/"&gt;http://bitsofmind.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/generic_variance_in_csharp_and_java/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8919176" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Generics</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rmbyers/archive/2006/06/01/613690.aspx#6675665</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:40:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6675665</guid><dc:creator>Noticias externas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Also, few blog enteries on generics and variance in generics. Find them to be really useful. First one&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6675665" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>MSDN Blog Postings  &amp;raquo; Generics</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rmbyers/archive/2006/06/01/613690.aspx#6675630</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:37:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6675630</guid><dc:creator>MSDN Blog Postings  » Generics</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2007/12/06/generics/"&gt;http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2007/12/06/generics/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6675630" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Generics</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rmbyers/archive/2006/06/01/613690.aspx#6675556</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:29:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6675556</guid><dc:creator>Blog of Jitu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Also, few blog enteries on generics and variance in generics. Find them to be really useful. First one&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6675556" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Generic type parameter variance in the CLR</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rmbyers/archive/2006/06/01/613690.aspx#4294289</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:44:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4294289</guid><dc:creator>Rick Byers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When people start using C# generics for the first time, they are sometimes surprised that they can’t&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4294289" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>UnitTests&lt;T&gt;</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rmbyers/archive/2006/06/01/613690.aspx#4030951</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:30:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4030951</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Stopford's Weblog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Not often I get the jump on it's old master but MbUnit answers Peli's post on unit testing generics&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4030951" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Covariance, Contravariance and Generics Part Deux</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rmbyers/archive/2006/06/01/613690.aspx#692854</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 06:04:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:692854</guid><dc:creator>The Original .NET Geek</dc:creator><description>So I just wanted to follow up on my last post where I described in detail (agonizing) how I thought it&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=692854" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: More on generic variance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rmbyers/archive/2006/06/01/613690.aspx#692332</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:05:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:692332</guid><dc:creator>Rick Byers - exMSFT</dc:creator><description>Yep, an interface would demonstrate the same thing. &amp;nbsp;I thought using an abstract base class would be slightly simpler, but either way is fine...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=692332" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: More on generic variance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rmbyers/archive/2006/06/01/613690.aspx#692117</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:45:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:692117</guid><dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator><description>Why having an abstract class Shape, I guess an IShape interface will do the job ? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=692117" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>