<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>New Crypto Algorithms in Orcas</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2007/01/17/new-crypto-algorithms-in-orcas.aspx</link><description>The January CTP of Orcas is now available , and with it comes a total of 12 new cryptography algorithm implementation classes, which include 2.5 new algorithms. (I'll count AES as 0.5 since we did already have Rijndael :-) ). These classes also are the</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: New Crypto Algorithms in Orcas</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2007/01/17/new-crypto-algorithms-in-orcas.aspx#9962886</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:10:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9962886</guid><dc:creator>spandey</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to convert existing crypto component to use AES256 for symmetric encryption decryption. I started looking at it and found two classes: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. AESManaged under System.Security.Cryptography&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. AES256 class under Microsoft.Web.Services.Security.Cryptography that comes under WSE2.0 framework.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please advise about why Microsoft has provided same set of classes under two different assemblies and which one to use in my .Net WCF Crypto Service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Shaurav&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9962886" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Security stuff in Orcas framework</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2007/01/17/new-crypto-algorithms-in-orcas.aspx#1883424</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:49:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1883424</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Moth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;New Security stuff in Orcas framework&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1883424" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New Crypto Algorithms in Orcas</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2007/01/17/new-crypto-algorithms-in-orcas.aspx#1748272</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:23:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1748272</guid><dc:creator>shawnfa</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Aaron,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That's probably a better question to ask the ASP.NET guys. &amp;nbsp;I'm not sure what work, if any, they've done to support operation in FIPS mode.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Shawn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1748272" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New Crypto Algorithms in Orcas</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2007/01/17/new-crypto-algorithms-in-orcas.aspx#1743146</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:25:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1743146</guid><dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;How about the Asp.net 2.0 vs FIPS problem you commented on in &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/05/16/417975.aspx"&gt;https://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/05/16/417975.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it currently possible to build an asp.net 2.0 with Require FIPS enabled on the server. I've tried the &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;machineKey validationKey=&amp;quot;AutoGenerate,IsolateApps&amp;quot; decryptionKey=&amp;quot;AutoGenerate,IsolateApps&amp;quot; validation=&amp;quot;TripleDES&amp;quot; decryption=&amp;quot;3DES&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fix listed in the KB and it doesn't work. This is a HUGE problem with government systems. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aaron&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1743146" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New Crypto Algorithms in Orcas</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2007/01/17/new-crypto-algorithms-in-orcas.aspx#1490201</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:12:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1490201</guid><dc:creator>shawnfa</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Levi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, no :-(&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;System.Core.dll is part of the Orcas Green Bits. &amp;nbsp;To support RSA-SHA256 we'd need to update mscorlib.dll, which is part of Orcas Red Bits. &amp;nbsp;Unfortunately, we're not allowed to have red bits dependencies on green bits, so we could not make this change. &amp;nbsp;However, we are now totally unblocked from allowing RSA-SHA256 in the next release of the framework.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(You might want to check out Soma's blog on green vs red bits here: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/05/18/601354.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/05/18/601354.aspx&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Shawn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1490201" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New Crypto Algorithms in Orcas</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2007/01/17/new-crypto-algorithms-in-orcas.aspx#1485725</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:50:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1485725</guid><dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does the addition of the SHA2 algorithms to the CNG mean that we'll finally be able to use RSA-SHA256? :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1485725" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>