<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ZoneSandboxAppDomainManager.cs</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2004/11/17/259103.aspx</link><description>1 using System; 2 using System.Reflection; 3 using System.Security; 4 using System.Security.Policy; 5 6 namespace AppDomainManagers 7 { 8 public sealed class ZoneSandboxAppDomainManager : AppDomainManager 9 { 10 private AppDomain internetDomain = null</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: ZoneSandboxAppDomainManager.cs</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2004/11/17/259103.aspx#9968864</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:21:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9968864</guid><dc:creator>shawnfa</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;5 years later, we now ship frameworks such as the Managed Extensibility Framework and Managed AddIn Framework that take care of lots of the security and versioning issues for you. &amp;nbsp;I would recommend checking those out to see if they meet your needs before rolling your own implementation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Shawn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9968864" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: ZoneSandboxAppDomainManager.cs</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2004/11/17/259103.aspx#9950549</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:40:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9950549</guid><dc:creator>Merritt Graves</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;5 years later, would you still use this approach for loading untrusted 3rd party plugins, or would you recommend a different approach to sandboxing an app domain? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a scenario where I am writing code that is explicitly responsible for loading code written by untrust(ed/able) 3rd parties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9950549" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Customizing the AppDomain Creation Process</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2004/11/17/259103.aspx#259115</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:259115</guid><dc:creator>.Net Security Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=259115" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Customizing the AppDomain Creation Process</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2004/11/17/259103.aspx#259110</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:259110</guid><dc:creator>.Net Security Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=259110" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>