<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Mike Stall on Finding the Real Exception Call stack</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2005/01/19/356376.aspx</link><description>Mike's got an interesting piece up today about using WinDbg to find the actual call stack of an unmanaged (or managed for that matter) exception . It's this kind of power debugging technique that makes WinDbg my all time favorite debugger.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Mike Stall on Finding the Real Exception Call stack</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2005/01/19/356376.aspx#356421</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:356421</guid><dc:creator>Mike Stall</dc:creator><description>The VS guys pointed out that you can do this in Visual Studio too (I didn't realize at the time I posted). See &lt;a target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jmstall/archive/2005/01/18/355697.aspx#356316"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/jmstall/archive/2005/01/18/355697.aspx#356316&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=356421" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>