<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>A Closer Look at the Simple Sandboxed AppDomain</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/09/449563.aspx</link><description>Yesterday we took a look at Whidbey's new Simple Sandboxing API . At first glance this API does seem relatively simple, however when you start to look closer at the AppDomain that is created for your sandboxed code, there are a few surprising properties</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Securing AppDomain Data</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/09/449563.aspx#454796</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:49:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:454796</guid><dc:creator>.Net Security Blog</dc:creator><description>While we're on the topic of AppDomains ...&lt;br&gt;One feature of AppDomains that many people don't know about...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=454796" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: A Closer Look at the Simple Sandboxed AppDomain</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/09/449563.aspx#454759</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:09:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:454759</guid><dc:creator>shawnfa</dc:creator><description>In order to pull that off, the ClickOnce app needs to have permission to read from the internet and write to a folder it can load assemblies from.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Partial trust ClickOnce apps do not have permission to discover where they're executing from -- this means they won't know where to write that assembly to.  That prevents them from being able to load any code they want under their permission set.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, there's no need for them to connect to the Internet -- why wouldn't a malicious app just include the untrustworthy code in its install?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Shawn&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=454759" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: A Closer Look at the Simple Sandboxed AppDomain</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/09/449563.aspx#454055</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 20:46:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:454055</guid><dc:creator>Keith Brown</dc:creator><description>Wow. That is *very* different. So click-once apps will run under this model as opposed to the older policy-based model?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if a ClickOnce app dynamically downloads assemblies from the Internet, they will also get the overall app's grant set? Now I'm starting to get mihailik's heebie jeebies...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=454055" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>