A reader questions the nature of the value type when he writes, Sender: Slawomir Lisznianski ===================================== 1) Lack of support for SMFs makes value classes unnatural to use. An example in the C++/CLI spec at page 33 is incorrect...

A reader asks, Sender: Jack re: String Literals are now a Trivial Conversion to String Won't it break most of existing libraries who will try to port to C++/CLI? One override for String^ will break a lot of user code and make calls for the overriden...

A reader asks, Sender: Jack re: String Literals are now a Trivial Conversion to String Won't it break most of existing libraries who will try to port to C++/CLI? One override for String^ will break a lot of user code and make calls for the overriden...

There was a recent internal thread on the resolution of the following set of overloaded member functions of a reference class R. It represents a change in the earlier definition of C++/CLI, and a difference in type behavior that I reported in an earlier...