Posts
  • Stan Lippman's BLog

    The Value of a Value Class

    • 9 Comments
    A reader questions the nature of the value type when he writes, Sender: Slawomir Lisznianski ===================================== 1) Lack of support for SMFs makes value classes unnatural to use. An example in the C++/CLI spec at page 33 is incorrect...
  • Stan Lippman's BLog

    String Literal Conversion to String: Is It a Disaster?

    • 1 Comments
    A reader asks, Sender: Jack re: String Literals are now a Trivial Conversion to String Won't it break most of existing libraries who will try to port to C++/CLI? One override for String^ will break a lot of user code and make calls for the overriden...
  • Stan Lippman's BLog

    String Literal Conversion to String: Is It a Disaster?

    • 0 Comments
    A reader asks, Sender: Jack re: String Literals are now a Trivial Conversion to String Won't it break most of existing libraries who will try to port to C++/CLI? One override for String^ will break a lot of user code and make calls for the overriden...
  • Stan Lippman's BLog

    String Literals are now a Trivial Conversion to String

    • 6 Comments
    There was a recent internal thread on the resolution of the following set of overloaded member functions of a reference class R. It represents a change in the earlier definition of C++/CLI, and a difference in type behavior that I reported in an earlier...
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)