http://blogs.msdn.com/b/slippman/archive/2004/07/19/187758.aspxThere was a recent internal thread on the resolution of the following set of overloaded member functions of a reference class R. It represents a change in the earlier definition of C++/CLI, and a difference in type behavior that I reported in an earlieren-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/slippman/archive/2004/07/19/187758.aspx#9787653Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:53:04 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9787653 Stan Lippman s BLog String Literals are now a Trivial Conversion to | debt settlement program<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://edebtsettlementprogram.info/story.php?id=22672">http://edebtsettlementprogram.info/story.php?id=22672</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9787653" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/slippman/archive/2004/07/19/187758.aspx#9780982Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:50:11 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9780982 Stan Lippman s BLog String Literals are now a Trivial Conversion to | bar stools<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://barstoolsite.info/story.php?id=6622">http://barstoolsite.info/story.php?id=6622</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9780982" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/slippman/archive/2004/07/19/187758.aspx#202649Sat, 31 Jul 2004 02:53:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:202649Yves Dolce<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=202649" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/slippman/archive/2004/07/19/187758.aspx#202646Sat, 31 Jul 2004 02:51:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:202646Yves Dolce<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=202646" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/slippman/archive/2004/07/19/187758.aspx#189939Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:46:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:189939Adam Merz&quot;Maybe it is better to make two types of string literals differ by, say literal prefix (i.e. old string literals would look like &quot;this&quot;, and new ones like c&quot;this&quot;)?&quot; <br> <br>That is exactly what Managed Extensions for C++ did with the S prefix, and what they are trying to avoid at this point (I would think)...<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=189939" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/slippman/archive/2004/07/19/187758.aspx#189890Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:43:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:189890JackWon't it break most of existing libraries who will try to port to C++/CLI? One override for String^ will break a lot of user code and make calls for the overriden function with string literals look much uglier. Maybe it is better to make two types of string literals differ by, say literal prefix (i.e. old string literals would look like &quot;this&quot;, and new ones like c&quot;this&quot;)?<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=189890" width="1" height="1">