<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Silverlight vs. Flash – An Analysis Report - Silverlight</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/socaldevgal/archive/2007/12/12/silverlight-vs-flash-an-analysis-report-silverlight.aspx</link><description>This is an interesting blog post, quite controversial, of course, but none-the-less interesting reading. Silverlight vs. Flash – An Analysis Report - Silverlight</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Silverlight vs. Flash – An Analysis Report - Silverlight</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/socaldevgal/archive/2007/12/12/silverlight-vs-flash-an-analysis-report-silverlight.aspx#6826887</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:06:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6826887</guid><dc:creator>Wm Steele</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I find it interesting, however, very inaccurate. &amp;nbsp;No Databinding in Silverlight... wow... if that is true, then I'm going to have to pull several of my examples showing how easy it is to do it. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even at that time frame (July '07) the bits I had back then did it. &amp;nbsp;It's one of it's advertised core strengths. &amp;nbsp;Therefore, I take it with a big giant grain of salt - and I hate salt!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Merry Christmas, Lynn!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bill&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6826887" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Silverlight vs. Flash – An Analysis Report - Silverlight</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/socaldevgal/archive/2007/12/12/silverlight-vs-flash-an-analysis-report-silverlight.aspx#6763777</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:19:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6763777</guid><dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;That’s true for many products. &amp;nbsp;Some people are comfortable with a 57 Chevy and some are comfortable with a Ferrari Enzo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6763777" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Silverlight vs. Flash – An Analysis Report - Silverlight</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/socaldevgal/archive/2007/12/12/silverlight-vs-flash-an-analysis-report-silverlight.aspx#6762986</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:52:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6762986</guid><dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Most of the information is out-dated but still an interesting look into the feature sets of both. Basically &amp;nbsp;I think it comes down to what you are comfortable using and what your users want.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One thing Flash has is the years of experience and war-tested information on what users and browsers want.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6762986" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Silverlight vs. Flash – An Analysis Report - Silverlight</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/socaldevgal/archive/2007/12/12/silverlight-vs-flash-an-analysis-report-silverlight.aspx#6751883</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:17:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6751883</guid><dc:creator>lynnlangit</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I know - it's so tough to find accurate information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'd rather just stay out of the us-vs-them discussion and present what I know Silverlight can do. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My audience keep 'baiting me' with a &amp;quot;Compare, Compare, Compare&amp;quot; plea though. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6751883" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Silverlight vs. Flash – An Analysis Report - Silverlight</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/socaldevgal/archive/2007/12/12/silverlight-vs-flash-an-analysis-report-silverlight.aspx#6751797</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:07:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6751797</guid><dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've done half the things he says Silverlight can't do, but maybe I’m on a different version…called “the latest”. &amp;nbsp;Silverlight will eat Flash for breakfast and the only people complaining will be the crystalline weenies who wasted their lives learning (and agonizing over) Flash. &amp;nbsp;imho&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6751797" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>