.NET FX 4

re: .NET FX 4

Plua — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:56:48 GMT

Like Bo, I would like to see support for quad (or greater)precision. Even if it is software-only for now.

re: .NET FX 4

rrvenki — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:43:55 GMT

Will OledbCommand support AsyncResult processing?

Will all Interop.xxxxx be completely .NET compliant?

Will all protocls https,.. be supported in silverlight?

Will WWF really make its way into Enterprise region?

re: .NET FX 4

Chris Beers — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:52:20 GMT

Is .NET Framework 4.0 going to be a full release or another additive release like 3.0 and 3.5 are? In other words, when I eventually install 4.0, will there be a C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0\CONFIG folder that I would go to to manage my machine.config etc. instead of v2.0.50727? Also, in participating with Connect, there were a lot of bugs that were supposed to be addressed as part of the red bits (or was that green bits?), but never got fixed because of the feature push for .NET 3.0. Are these going to be addressed as well in .NET 4.0?

re: .NET FX 4

rconde02 — Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:25:34 GMT

Just a post so I can watch the thread...ignore.

re: .NET FX 4

Robert Conde — Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:21:42 GMT

Regarding the text improvements...will there also be improvements to scrolling text issues described here:

http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=445078

For me, this issue is a deal breaker for developing new apps in WPF.

re: .NET FX 4

Jason Webb — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:03:40 GMT

Thanks so much. Keep up the great work!!

Jason

re: .NET FX 4

Ben Westbrook [MSFT] — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:51:46 GMT

Jason,

I'm a developer on the WPF team. We are tracking the issues you raise, and we hope to address them in a future release.

The current caret thickness render, in particular, is a bug that we have been looking at closely. We would also like to see it render thin and crisply. FWIW, it is currently possible to adjust the caret thickness in the "Ease of Access Center" control panel, using "Set the thickness of the blinking cursor" combobox. In this case the setting is desktop global, intended to aid users who have difficultiy viewing a standard thin caret.

Ben

re: .NET FX 4

Jason Webb — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:26:27 GMT

One added note:

The Caret suggestion feedback I mentioned also allows you to manually adjust the Caret size and bring the older size if you like it better. You'll find this and much more details when you read the actual feedback report. The same goes for the other feedback report... there's much more details when you read the whole thing.

If anyone else agrees with these feedback suggestions, feel free to vote and leave comments.

Thanks again!

Jason Webb (jasonw15@msn.com)

re: .NET FX 4

Jason Webb — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:17:02 GMT

Please view these two feedback item on Connect regarding improving WPF below and please review and consider the ideas for updates in the the .NET 4.0 release of WPF-

Please update the WPF 4.0 default text Caret width to the “thinner” version used in all other platforms:

https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=382313

Please add the great features from the “RichTextBox” control to the standard “TextBox” and “ComboBox” controls in .NET 4.0 (Triple Click select, Selection Margin-cursor indent, etc):

https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=375044

Thanks for your time.

Jason Webb

re: .NET FX 4

mattgi — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:33:42 GMT

Hello Patrick,

I am the Group Manager for WinForms. We continue to invest in WinForms for .NET FX 4. This includes the core expectation of maintaining compatibility for applications already written in WinForms, fixing bugs that developers have reported, contributing to overall developer experiences across Visual Studio, as well as perf work and some feature development.

Matt Gibbs