The paper on Oberon Script that I submitted to the Joint Modular Languages Conference (JMLC 2006), and that I wrote about in my last post was accepted. Thank you! In the mean time, two toolkits were announced to the public that allow developing AJAX-style Web Client Applications (WCAs) in a high-level language which is then compiled to JavaScript as a high-level object code. The two are Google's Web Toolkit (GWT), based on Java, and ASP.NET architect Nikhil Kothari's Script#, based on C# (snappy name, by the way, isn't it. "GWT" looks rather clumsy next to it, and too close to GWB for comfort). I haven't tried any of them yet, but the code examples look promising (in particular the JavaScript translations). I can see a few problems developing in a "foreign" i.e. non-script environment, but perhaps that's just superficial.
Anyway, the main difference between GWT and Script# on the one hand, and Oberon Script on the other (apart from the language) is that they are offline compilers while Oberon Script is a load-time i.e. online compiler. Also, Oberon Script is a proof-of-concept whereas the other two are production systems (that they are both still beta quality does not negate that). The offline-online distinction is significant. You certainly don't want to compile a full application client-side into JavaScript. This makes Oberon Script in the current form a loser. However, there are situations where it makes perfect sense to generate a few bits of JavaScript on-the-fly:
The Oberon Script project can be seen as an attempt to stake off the limits of what can be reasonably accomplished on-the-fly. In any case, I think we can expect to see more development in this area of compilation to JavaScript, and some of it certainly also client-side.