<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Sonu's Tech Log</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/</link><description>Sonu&amp;#39;s ramblings on &amp;#39;what&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;why&amp;#39; of software products she experiences at Microsoft</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Application lifecycle artifact metadata priorities</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/26/application-lifecycle-artifact-metadata-priorities.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9986031</guid><dc:creator>sonua</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=9986031</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/26/application-lifecycle-artifact-metadata-priorities.aspx#comments</comments><description>The SQL Server Modeling CTP – Nov 2009 Release 2 has the model schema for following domains: 
 · .NET assemblies 
 · Unified Modeling Language 2 (UML2) 
 · Next generation identity 
 As we finalize the plan for our V1, we are trying to figure out...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/26/application-lifecycle-artifact-metadata-priorities.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9986031" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/SSMoS/">SSMoS</category></item><item><title>Technical women in product engineering groups at Microsoft</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/25/technical-women-in-product-engineering-groups-at-microsoft.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9985468</guid><dc:creator>sonua</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=9985468</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/25/technical-women-in-product-engineering-groups-at-microsoft.aspx#comments</comments><description>There are about ~20 Technical Fellows (all men) and ~48 Distinguished Engineers (all men) at Microsoft. There are a handful of women who are in the executive ranks, including two Senior Vice Presidents. Mary Jo Foley (author of " All About Microsoft ...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/25/technical-women-in-product-engineering-groups-at-microsoft.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9985468" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/Just+Because/">Just Because</category></item><item><title>MIX10 videos</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/19/mix10-videos.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9981704</guid><dc:creator>sonua</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=9981704</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/19/mix10-videos.aspx#comments</comments><description>The videos from MIX 2010 conference are available online. 
 http://live.visitmix.com/videos 
 There are so many good sessions that I want to watch. I am especially interested in the following to begin with, purely because of personal interest. (Unfortunately...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/19/mix10-videos.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9981704" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/Just+Because/">Just Because</category></item><item><title>SQL Server Modeling Services Usability Study – System.Runtime Model/Loader</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/18/sql-server-modeling-services-usability-study-system-runtime-model-loader.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9981530</guid><dc:creator>sonua</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=9981530</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/18/sql-server-modeling-services-usability-study-system-runtime-model-loader.aspx#comments</comments><description>One of the favorite part of my job as a Program Manager in product engineering groups at Microsoft is seeking customer feedback for products we build. It is really energizing for me to let people take our under-development products for a test run and...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/18/sql-server-modeling-services-usability-study-system-runtime-model-loader.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9981530" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/Oslo/">Oslo</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/SSMoS/">SSMoS</category></item><item><title>System.Runtime Schema: Resolving references using 'binding context'</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/16/system-runtime-schema-resolving-references-using-binding-context.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9980105</guid><dc:creator>sonua</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=9980105</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/16/system-runtime-schema-resolving-references-using-binding-context.aspx#comments</comments><description>In my previous post “ Assembly, Type and Method References ”, I talked about how AssemblyReferences , TypeReferences and MethodReferences entities can be used to find references across assemblies, types and methods. 
 Context 
 Binding Context is a...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/16/system-runtime-schema-resolving-references-using-binding-context.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9980105" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/Oslo/">Oslo</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/SSMoS/">SSMoS</category></item><item><title>System.Runtime Schema: Method Details</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/12/system-runtime-schema-method-details.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9977807</guid><dc:creator>sonua</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=9977807</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/12/system-runtime-schema-method-details.aspx#comments</comments><description>Continuing on my series of “ Exploring relational schema for .NET assemblies in SQL Server Modeling Services ”, in this post I will drill-into entities related to ‘methods’. 
 Type definitions are made up of methods. A method is a subroutine defined...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/12/system-runtime-schema-method-details.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9977807" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/Oslo/">Oslo</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/SSMoS/">SSMoS</category></item><item><title>Sample Eclipse plug-in for SQL Server Modeling Services</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/11/sample-eclipse-plug-in-for-sql-server-modeling-services.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9977409</guid><dc:creator>sonua</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=9977409</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/11/sample-eclipse-plug-in-for-sql-server-modeling-services.aspx#comments</comments><description>I have developed a sample Eclipse plug-in that uses one of the utilities in SQL Server Modeling Services (SSMoS). Yes, it is just an experiment and NOT a shipping sample or code as part of SSMoS (not yet anyways – Microsoft has an ongoing initiative to...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/11/sample-eclipse-plug-in-for-sql-server-modeling-services.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9977409" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/Oslo/">Oslo</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/UML/">UML</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/SSMoS/">SSMoS</category></item><item><title>Download R2 of SQL Server Modeling Nov 2009 CTP</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/09/download-r2-of-sql-server-modeling-nov-2009-ctp.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9975628</guid><dc:creator>sonua</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=9975628</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/09/download-r2-of-sql-server-modeling-nov-2009-ctp.aspx#comments</comments><description>SQL Server Modeling Nov 2009 CTP R2 is a re-release of the CTP for it to work with Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4.0 RC releases. Download it here ....(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/09/download-r2-of-sql-server-modeling-nov-2009-ctp.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9975628" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/Oslo/">Oslo</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/SSMoS/">SSMoS</category></item><item><title>System.Runtime Schema: Type Details</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/04/system-runtime-schema-type-details.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9972727</guid><dc:creator>sonua</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=9972727</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/04/system-runtime-schema-type-details.aspx#comments</comments><description>Types are cornerstone of application programming. A .NET developer works with the CLR type system by programming the managed types. Some of the examples of CLR managed types are: Class, Structure, Enumeration, Delegate and Interface. A namespace is a...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/04/system-runtime-schema-type-details.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9972727" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/Oslo/">Oslo</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/SSMoS/">SSMoS</category></item><item><title>System.Runtime Schema: Assembly, Type and Method References</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/03/system-runtime-schema-assembly-type-and-method-references.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9972557</guid><dc:creator>sonua</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=9972557</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/03/system-runtime-schema-assembly-type-and-method-references.aspx#comments</comments><description>As a continuation of my previous post on exploring relational schema for .NET Assemblies , let me drill-into a few more entities in the System.Runtime data model. 
 .NET applications are made up of multiple assemblies. Assemblies reference assemblies...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/2010/03/03/system-runtime-schema-assembly-type-and-method-references.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9972557" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sonuarora/archive/tags/SSMoS/">SSMoS</category></item></channel></rss>