<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Vertical Partitioning in SQL Azure: Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlazure/archive/2010/05/17/10014011.aspx</link><description>SQL Azure currently supports 1 GB and 10 GB databases. If you want to store larger amounts of data in SQL Azure you can divide your tables across multiple SQL Azure databases. This article will discuss how to use a middle layer to join two tables on different</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Vertical Partitioning in SQL Azure: Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlazure/archive/2010/05/17/10014011.aspx#10035805</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:00:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10035805</guid><dc:creator>Chris Auld</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple of quick notes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The TicketDirect app uses horizontal partitioning to scale out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bascially it creates lots of partitions for the high load period and then consolidates them again when demand has subsided&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This biggest reason for verticaly partitioning in SQL Azure is to pull the large content (binary and big text) out of SQL Azure and stick it in Windows Azure Storage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10035805" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Vertical Partitioning in SQL Azure: Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlazure/archive/2010/05/17/10014011.aspx#10016457</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 17:40:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10016457</guid><dc:creator>anon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What are you doing to make it easier to have a single Entity Data Model that is composed of multiple physical SQL Azure Databases?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10016457" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Vertical Partitioning in SQL Azure: Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlazure/archive/2010/05/17/10014011.aspx#10015892</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 20:37:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10015892</guid><dc:creator>Wayne Walter Berry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are many things that we will be implementing in the future to make this particular scenario easier. &amp;nbsp;We are just getting started. &amp;nbsp;The code above is one intern solution to this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10015892" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Vertical Partitioning in SQL Azure: Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlazure/archive/2010/05/17/10014011.aspx#10014996</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 19:18:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10014996</guid><dc:creator>Chris Adkin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Its a shame that SQL Azure does not yet support service broker and distributed partition views. You could use your first database to contains your map, always connect to this, service broker would then distribute the data across your databases and then dpvs would present a consolidated view of it all. This would minimise the amount of coding you would have to carry out in the tier above the database in order to achieve the same result.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10014996" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>