<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>An in-depth look at SQL Server Memory–Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqljourney/archive/2012/12/17/an-in-depth-look-at-sql-server-memory-part-1.aspx</link><description>I know that memory management in SQL Server is one area that&amp;rsquo;s a bit of an enigma for a lot of people, and most of us only tend to know as much about memory as is related to our day-to-day activities. In this post(and others in this series), I shall</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: An in-depth look at SQL Server Memory–Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqljourney/archive/2012/12/17/an-in-depth-look-at-sql-server-memory-part-1.aspx#10412869</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 15:25:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10412869</guid><dc:creator>HarshDeep_Singh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Vijay,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many thanks for appreciating the effort. Glad to know you found it useful. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Harsh&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10412869" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: An in-depth look at SQL Server Memory–Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqljourney/archive/2012/12/17/an-in-depth-look-at-sql-server-memory-part-1.aspx#10412854</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:40:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10412854</guid><dc:creator>Vijay Kondapally</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome!! So many questions answered in a cogent manner. The visual representation of the memory allocation/usage is very useful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10412854" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: An in-depth look at SQL Server Memory–Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqljourney/archive/2012/12/17/an-in-depth-look-at-sql-server-memory-part-1.aspx#10393378</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:50:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10393378</guid><dc:creator>HarshDeep_Singh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Lonny,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for appreciating. Can you please elaborate on what you mean by &amp;quot;disfavouring&amp;quot; ? I will be more than happy to research and get back to you on this, as long as I know what you&amp;#39;re looking for. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Harsh&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10393378" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: An in-depth look at SQL Server Memory–Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqljourney/archive/2012/12/17/an-in-depth-look-at-sql-server-memory-part-1.aspx#10393248</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:47:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10393248</guid><dc:creator>Lonny Niederstadt</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article! &amp;nbsp;One aspect of SQL Server memory management which I&amp;#39;ve found very scant information on is disfavoring of database pages in the buffer pool. &amp;nbsp;For dbcc checkdb to disfavor its pages seems fairly straightforward, but for scans consuming more than 10% of the database cache, this doesn&amp;#39;t seem very straightforward. &amp;nbsp;For example, does the decision to disfavor happen before the first reads for the scan? &amp;nbsp;Or are pages &amp;#39;retro-disfavored&amp;#39; after the 10% threshold is reached? &amp;nbsp;It seems that the 10% threshold is probably of the database cache for the NUMA node local to the scan itself - is that correct?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10393248" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: An in-depth look at SQL Server Memory–Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqljourney/archive/2012/12/17/an-in-depth-look-at-sql-server-memory-part-1.aspx#10378581</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:16:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10378581</guid><dc:creator>Nivedita</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent work Harsh!!! Am sure this will help many folks who work with SQL Server, it covers quite a lot of information to be picked up...!!! Cheers...!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10378581" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>