http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2008/04/27/a-changed-approach-to-service-packs.aspxIn reference to the recent announcement of a Service Pack 3 for SQL Server 2005 I wanted to take some time and elaborate a bit over a modified development approach we’ll be taking for SQL Server Servicing releases. With our recent SP3 announcement ween-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2008/04/27/a-changed-approach-to-service-packs.aspx#9483154Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:52:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9483154SQL<p>Today we are excited to announce the availability of our Community Technology Preview (CTP) for Service</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9483154" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2008/04/27/a-changed-approach-to-service-packs.aspx#9442013Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:28:26 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9442013Microsoft SQL Server Release Services<p>Today we are excited to announce the availability of our Customer Technology Preview (CTP) for Service</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9442013" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2008/04/27/a-changed-approach-to-service-packs.aspx#9247404Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:58:59 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9247404No1 Microsoft Fan<p>Note: This is a very helpful Blog posting via the Msft SQL Server and Dev tools team. Kudos. In order</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9247404" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2008/04/27/a-changed-approach-to-service-packs.aspx#9247063Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:40:53 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9247063Esoteric<p>In order to efficiently troubleshoot problems involving failed setup, we need to use the setup logs.</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9247063" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2008/04/27/a-changed-approach-to-service-packs.aspx#9226677Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:11:38 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9226677Microsoft SQL Server Release Services<p>On Dec 15th 2008, we released the latest Service Pack on SQL Server 2005. In line with the changed strategy</p><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9226677" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2008/04/27/a-changed-approach-to-service-packs.aspx#8462683Tue, 06 May 2008 13:34:24 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8462683sqloogle<p>Frequent release of Service Packs?</p> <p>Can you please elaborate on the schedule, is it every 6 months or 1 year?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8462683" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2008/04/27/a-changed-approach-to-service-packs.aspx#8437136Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:30:51 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8437136Allen White<p>Matthias Berndt, Principal Group Program Manager at Microsoft, has just blogged about the new approach</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8437136" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2008/04/27/a-changed-approach-to-service-packs.aspx#8434714Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:48:45 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8434714EXEC dbo.LongTermMemory__Archive<p>Those of you who read my blog regularly may have noticed the previous post and maybe more important the</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8434714" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2008/04/27/a-changed-approach-to-service-packs.aspx#8432076Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:33:28 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8432076Microsoft news and tips &raquo; A changed approach to Service Packs<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://microsoftnews.askpcdoc.com/sql-server-2005/a-changed-approach-to-service-packs">http://microsoftnews.askpcdoc.com/sql-server-2005/a-changed-approach-to-service-packs</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8432076" width="1" height="1">