<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Dynamic dispatch in C#</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/srivatsn/archive/2008/02/05/dynamic-dispatch-in-c.aspx</link><description>Charlie Calvert blogged about dynamic support in C# 4.0 . I love this for two reasons. One it will enable dynamic language interop and COM automation interop in a much better way, and two it will use the DLR. So if you were writing COM automation interop</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Dynamic dispatch in C#</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/srivatsn/archive/2008/02/05/dynamic-dispatch-in-c.aspx#8685507</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:36:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8685507</guid><dc:creator>Justin Chase</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not a big fan of they dynamic block idea. I'd much rather see a dynamic variable type such as:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dynamic x = 0;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x.Bad(); // compiles but has runtime exception&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;or a dynamic calling syntax such as:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;int x = 0;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x:Bad(); // : to indicate dynamic&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is a blog post I wrote about it&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.justnbusiness.com/Blogs/CSharp_Optionally_Dynamic_Calls.aspx"&gt;http://www.justnbusiness.com/Blogs/CSharp_Optionally_Dynamic_Calls.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8685507" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Dynamic dispatch in C#</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/srivatsn/archive/2008/02/05/dynamic-dispatch-in-c.aspx#7523253</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:03:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7523253</guid><dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree about the operator.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I like the obj..MyMethod(&amp;quot;Hello&amp;quot;, 3) idea.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because its easy to remember&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One . for static&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;two .. for Dynamic&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm not so crazy about the dynamic block idea but hey its early and they should experiment with various ideas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7523253" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>dynamic ですって？</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/srivatsn/archive/2008/02/05/dynamic-dispatch-in-c.aspx#7483913</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:51:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7483913</guid><dc:creator>とりこらぼ。</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;dynamic ですって？&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7483913" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>MSDN Blog Postings  &amp;raquo; Dynamic dispatch in C#</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/srivatsn/archive/2008/02/05/dynamic-dispatch-in-c.aspx#7455505</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:26:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7455505</guid><dc:creator>MSDN Blog Postings  » Dynamic dispatch in C#</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/02/05/dynamic-dispatch-in-c/"&gt;http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/02/05/dynamic-dispatch-in-c/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7455505" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>