<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Migrating Oracle Materialized View to SQL Server</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ssma/archive/2011/06/20/migrating-oracle-materialized-view-to-sql-server.aspx</link><description>By Gowri Shanker and Welly Lee. 
 This blog post discusses approaches to migrate Oracle Materialized View to SQL Server. We compare Materialized View with SQL Server Indexed View, discuss scenarios supported by Indexed View and provide suggestions you</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Migrating Oracle Materialized View to SQL Server</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ssma/archive/2011/06/20/migrating-oracle-materialized-view-to-sql-server.aspx#10293556</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:33:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10293556</guid><dc:creator>WQ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Why SLQ Server doesn&amp;#39;t allow creating indexed views with subqueries? This is a serious limitation during migration from Oracle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10293556" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>