February, 2004

  • Steve Kirk's WebLog

    TechEd Architecture Track: What do you think?

    • 0 Comments
    Are we covering the right topics? Are the session titles clear? By title: What do you want covered? Pre conference Architecture Track What should be available online before the conference? Post Conference What should be available online after the...
  • Steve Kirk's WebLog

    Tech Ed Architecture Track

    • 7 Comments
    I’ve been working with the .NET Enterprise Architecture Team (.NEAT), patterns & practices , and other teams at Microsoft on planning for the TechEd Architecture track. At this point the session listing on the TechEd site doesn't show the organization...
  • Steve Kirk's WebLog

    Localized Editions of the Microsoft Architecture Update

    • 2 Comments
    Some of the Microsoft subs outside of the US (the UK , Spain , and others) are planning to localize the newsletter and there will be some delay until we find out what all of the subs want to do. What do you think? If localization adds a delay would you...
  • Steve Kirk's WebLog

    February Microsoft Architecture Update ships

    • 3 Comments
    The February issue of the Microsoft Architecture update went out to subscribers in the US on Friday. This issue features an article by David Hill http://blogs.msdn.com/dphill on smart clients as well as an architecture calendar and a brief piece on Martin...
  • Steve Kirk's WebLog

    We're Updating the .NET Architecture Center

    • 2 Comments
    This morning we’re updating the .NET Architecture Center http://msdn.microsoft.com/architecture to use the latest MSDN developer center technology – the same used on the C# and other MSDN developer centers. One of the new capabilities this...
Page 1 of 1 (5 items)