Sorry, I'm just not convinced. While Live was not my prefered search engine, i did use it.

But bing simply doesn't inspire me, its not much different to live search, apart from the results relevance is a bit more random. It certainly doesn't save me much time, or make discovering any easier.

Obviously its a bit new so i could really give it the benefit of the doubt, but if your going to spend a fortune of ads you really should get the product right first.

In comparison to google wave or wolfram alpha which have had high wow factors, bing has been more of a sigh of dissapointment.

davidcoxon,

Prove your point that it does not work?  Can you give site an example? Or can one proove that Bing does what it does by comparing a decision path that is solved better with Bing than let say Google?

I need proof either way, proof that Bing either does not do what it does or it does do what it says it can do.

What was it that you where seraching for that Bing did work?

I saw the commercial and was intrigued enough to want to show a colleague here at the office.  Unfortunately, it appears that we use systems that the video plugin on this site will not operate with.  That's the anithesis of one of the central themes of the Internet's architecture, and until MicroSoft learns this fundamental lesson they are doomed to be an also-ran in this space.

I'll stick with Google.

nice posting thank for sharing, i hope bing can challange with google hehe