<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ConfigMgr 2012–Application Model–Internals–Part I</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverac/archive/2012/07/08/configmgr-2012-application-model-internals-part-i.aspx</link><description>By now it is widely known that one of the major shifts in ConfigMgr 2012 is the new application model. There is a lot of documentation about using the application model and creating the different elements associated &amp;ndash; but I haven&amp;rsquo;t seen anything</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: ConfigMgr 2012–Application Model–Internals–Part I</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverac/archive/2012/07/08/configmgr-2012-application-model-internals-part-i.aspx#10412250</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:00:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10412250</guid><dc:creator>ILYA [ sie ] Sazonov</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Many thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10412250" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: ConfigMgr 2012–Application Model–Internals–Part I</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverac/archive/2012/07/08/configmgr-2012-application-model-internals-part-i.aspx#10369709</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:29:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10369709</guid><dc:creator>steverac</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Just posted part II. &amp;nbsp;That may be it for the series. &amp;nbsp;Not sure yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10369709" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: ConfigMgr 2012–Application Model–Internals–Part I</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverac/archive/2012/07/08/configmgr-2012-application-model-internals-part-i.aspx#10367884</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:15:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10367884</guid><dc:creator>Anshul</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Fun yes :).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When are the pending sequels out ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10367884" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: ConfigMgr 2012–Application Model–Internals–Part I</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverac/archive/2012/07/08/configmgr-2012-application-model-internals-part-i.aspx#10332342</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:41:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10332342</guid><dc:creator>steverac</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great point - and it&amp;#39;s not official documentation. &amp;nbsp;I like &amp;#39;ConfigMgr database replication&amp;#39; better for the reason you specified. &amp;nbsp;Updated the article.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10332342" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: ConfigMgr 2012–Application Model–Internals–Part I</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverac/archive/2012/07/08/configmgr-2012-application-model-internals-part-i.aspx#10329957</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:48:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10329957</guid><dc:creator>ConfigMgr database replication?</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Wonderful article, as always, Steve! This level of detail can be handy when troubleshooting or scripting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I see you refer to &amp;quot;ConfigMgr SQL replication&amp;quot;. Is that official terminology? I was under the impression we should refer to it as &amp;quot;ConfigMgr database replication&amp;quot; (deemphasizing the SQL bit)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10329957" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>