<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Too Much Test Automation?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2005/01/28/362668.aspx</link><description>There was a time when testing software was synonymous with manual testing. Now with the rise of test development and the advent of unit testing, automation is becoming more and more prevalent. Test automation has many benefits but it is not a silver bullet</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title> Steve Rowe s Blog Too Much Test Automation | Quick Diets</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2005/01/28/362668.aspx#9745343</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 17:10:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9745343</guid><dc:creator> Steve Rowe s Blog Too Much Test Automation | Quick Diets</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://quickdietsite.info/story.php?id=1342"&gt;http://quickdietsite.info/story.php?id=1342&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9745343" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title> Steve Rowe s Blog Too Much Test Automation | Wood TV Stand</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2005/01/28/362668.aspx#9688187</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:25:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9688187</guid><dc:creator> Steve Rowe s Blog Too Much Test Automation | Wood TV Stand</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://woodtvstand.info/story.php?id=45120"&gt;http://woodtvstand.info/story.php?id=45120&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9688187" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title> Steve Rowe s Blog Too Much Test Automation | Paid Surveys</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2005/01/28/362668.aspx#9661607</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 03:26:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9661607</guid><dc:creator> Steve Rowe s Blog Too Much Test Automation | Paid Surveys</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=steve-rowe-s-blog-too-much-test-automation"&gt;http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=steve-rowe-s-blog-too-much-test-automation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9661607" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>We Need A Better Way To Test</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2005/01/28/362668.aspx#8570910</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 07:12:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8570910</guid><dc:creator>Steve Rowe's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Testing started simply. Developers would run their code after they wrote it to make sure it worked. When&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8570910" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>GUI Automation and ROI</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2005/01/28/362668.aspx#8340700</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:13:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8340700</guid><dc:creator>I. M. Testy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems that many test automation efforts around the industry tend to focus on GUI automation, or automating&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8340700" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>MSDN Blog Postings  &amp;raquo; When to Test Manually and When to Automate</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2005/01/28/362668.aspx#7908358</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:02:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7908358</guid><dc:creator>MSDN Blog Postings  » When to Test Manually and When to Automate</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/02/26/when-to-test-manually-and-when-to-automate-2/"&gt;http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/02/26/when-to-test-manually-and-when-to-automate-2/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7908358" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Testing Systems</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2005/01/28/362668.aspx#600736</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 10:07:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:600736</guid><dc:creator>Steve Rowe's Blog</dc:creator><description>This is the third in my series on test harnesses. In this post, I'll talk about systems that do much...&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=600736" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Dangers of Test Automation</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2005/01/28/362668.aspx#553906</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:42:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:553906</guid><dc:creator>Steve Rowe's Blog</dc:creator><description>&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; One of my favorite TV shows right now is House.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; In it a brilliant but antisocial doctor...&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=553906" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Interested in being a test developer?  We're hiring.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2005/01/28/362668.aspx#403827</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:403827</guid><dc:creator>Steve Rowe's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=403827" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Too Much Test Automation?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2005/01/28/362668.aspx#367171</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:367171</guid><dc:creator>Christopher Meisenzahl</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;You've really done a good job of describing the main issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am a big proponent of intelligent use of automation. And I suspec that there are many people out there calling their huge automation libraries a success just because of their size.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chris&lt;br&gt;&lt;a target="_new" href="http://amateureconblog.blogspot.com/"&gt;http://amateureconblog.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=367171" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>