<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Modularization vs. Integration - Which Is Best?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2008/02/07/modularization-vs-integration-which-is-best.aspx</link><description>Clayton Christensen's second book, The Innovator's Solution, produces several important theories in the realm of innovation. Like his first book, The Innovator's Dilemma, the second book should be required reading for anyone in technology and especially</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Modularization vs. Integration - Which Is Best?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2008/02/07/modularization-vs-integration-which-is-best.aspx#7543723</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:15:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7543723</guid><dc:creator>SteveRowe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Mark, that is an astute observation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@Shane, definitely check out this book. &amp;nbsp;The theory I describe is in chapters 5 and 6.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7543723" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Modularization vs. Integration - Which Is Best?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2008/02/07/modularization-vs-integration-which-is-best.aspx#7537691</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:39:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7537691</guid><dc:creator>Shane MacLaughlin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the heads up on Christensen's book, Steve. &amp;nbsp;A friend lent it too my a while back with a strong recommendation. &amp;nbsp;A second recommendation means I guess I should actually read it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Personally, I prefer being involved in more vertical markets, and as they inevitably flatten out, I move on. &amp;nbsp;The fractal analogy is a good one. &amp;nbsp;I tend to think of the leading edge of technology as being at the leaves with the heavier horizontal markets at the core.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7537691" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Modularization vs. Integration - Which Is Best?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2008/02/07/modularization-vs-integration-which-is-best.aspx#7519977</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:41:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7519977</guid><dc:creator>Mark Sowul</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you're right, then it's too bad that MS chose to abandon the modular (PlaysForSure) model and replace it with the integrated Zune model (to say nothing of the ill will and distrust inherently generated by abandoning PFS).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7519977" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>