<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Rich text in work items</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/teams_wit_tools/archive/2008/04/09/rich-text-in-work-items.aspx</link><description>It is probably common knowledge by now that the history and html fields allow rich text input. Since there is no toolbar to edit rich text, I have seen users even compose text in editors like Microsoft Word and then paste it in the work item. 
 
 But</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Rich text in work items</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/teams_wit_tools/archive/2008/04/09/rich-text-in-work-items.aspx#10141713</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:11:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10141713</guid><dc:creator>Priya</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As mentioned in the above comments, I have created a new &amp;#39;description&amp;#39; &amp;nbsp;field with &amp;#39;html&amp;#39; type, &amp;nbsp;but giving the reference name as system.description &amp;nbsp;is not allowed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can I just use other class path like Microsoft.vsts.common.description? &amp;nbsp;Is there a rule to have a particular field under specific reference path?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10141713" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>My posts on Team Foundation Server</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/teams_wit_tools/archive/2008/04/09/rich-text-in-work-items.aspx#9509063</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9509063</guid><dc:creator>Sunder Raman's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Buck Hodges , one of our Dev Managers, recently referenced one my posts and I got a couple of emails&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9509063" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sorting by multiple columns in work item tracking</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/teams_wit_tools/archive/2008/04/09/rich-text-in-work-items.aspx#9498487</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:52:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9498487</guid><dc:creator>Buck Hodges</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Recently I was showing someone the results of a bug query and sorting by more than one column in work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9498487" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Rich text in work items</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/teams_wit_tools/archive/2008/04/09/rich-text-in-work-items.aspx#8496396</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 22:45:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8496396</guid><dc:creator>Sunder Raman</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Steve,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If your description field is already HTML field then you don't have to do anything. If not, you will have to create a new HTML field for this as there isn't a way to convert field types.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sunder&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8496396" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Rich text in work items</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/teams_wit_tools/archive/2008/04/09/rich-text-in-work-items.aspx#8466513</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:36:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8466513</guid><dc:creator>skim</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Sunder,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm trying to implement RTF capabilities to the Description field. &amp;nbsp;Do I just change the field type of the existing Description field or add a new Description field and replace the existing one?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Steve&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8466513" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Rich text in work items</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/teams_wit_tools/archive/2008/04/09/rich-text-in-work-items.aspx#8425062</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:28:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8425062</guid><dc:creator>Sunder Raman</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Erik,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Glad to hear this addresses what you were looking for.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Your description field needs to be a HTML field. Plain text fields don't support rich text. Ok, that last part sounds a little funny.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sunder&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8425062" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>VSTS Links - 04/15/2008</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/teams_wit_tools/archive/2008/04/09/rich-text-in-work-items.aspx#8397946</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:16:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8397946</guid><dc:creator>Team System News</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Steve St. Jean on Whitepaper on Sarbanes-Oxley and TFS published on MSDN. The SRL Team Blog on ALM 403:...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8397946" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Team System Link Love #6</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/teams_wit_tools/archive/2008/04/09/rich-text-in-work-items.aspx#8379950</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:36:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8379950</guid><dc:creator>.NETicated</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Tips Disabling Continuous Integration for a single check-in on Angela B&amp;amp;#39;s blog More &amp;amp;quot;How Do&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8379950" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Rich text in work items</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/teams_wit_tools/archive/2008/04/09/rich-text-in-work-items.aspx#8374738</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:45:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8374738</guid><dc:creator>erik steiner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is what I am looking for!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, this does not work in my environment. The formatting toolbar remains inactive when the Description field of my work item types are in focus. It works for the comments in the History-control.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My Description field is of type &amp;quot;plain text&amp;quot; and for the form it is set to &amp;quot;HtmlFieldControl&amp;quot;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there any other prerequisite for that to work?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Erik&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8374738" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>