If broken it is, fix it you should

Using the powers of the debugger to solve the problems of the world - and a bag of chips    by Tess Ferrandez, ASP.NET Escalation Engineer (Microsoft)

Debug Diag script for troubleshooting .NET 2.0 Memory leaks

Debug Diag script for troubleshooting .NET 2.0 Memory leaks

Rate This
  • Comments 27

I have put together a quick and dirty debug diag script for troubleshooting .net memory leaks.  (attached to this post)
The reason I put it together was mainly to show how you can create your own debug diag scripts but feel free to use it to troubleshoot memory leaks, knowing that it does string parsing on the output so it is a bit prone to errors if sos changes output formats.

NOTE:  This script will only work on .NET 2.0 x86 memory dumps

Mourad recently published a whitepaper on debug diag that talks about how to use it for various scenarios and he also explains how to create some basic scripts and I used this as my starting point.

My script loads up sos from the framework directory and goes through the following steps.

1. Print .NET Framework Version
2. Print information on the GC (Garbage Collector) heaps and report the amount of memory used for .NET objects
3. Print and categorize the 40 most memory consuming object types (so that you can spot which object types you might be leaking or using a lot of)
4. Print the finalizequeue so that you can see what objects on the heap have finalizers to verify that they are neccessary.  It also reports potential blocking of the finalizer including the finalizer stack so that you can see if/why your finalizer thread is blocked.
5. Print objects on the large object heap
6. Determine and report the size of the cache for each asp.net application in the process
7. Report the number of active sessions in the process
8. Check if the process was in a GC when the dump was collected as this may invalidate heap/object information

How to use the script

1. Install debug diag 1.1 from http://www.microsoft.com/DOWNLOADS/details.aspx?FamilyID=28bd5941-c458-46f1-b24d-f60151d875a3&displaylang=en

2. Unzip the attached file and put the DotNetMemoryAnalysis.asp file in the C:\Program Files (x86)\DebugDiag\Scripts directory (or your debugdiag/scripts directory if you installed it somewhere else)

This will add a new analysis script to the Advanced Analysis tab in debug diag:


2. Generate a memory dump when memory usage is high. With debug diag you can do this by going into the processes tab, right-click on the process and select “Create Full Userdump”

3. In the Tools/Options & Settings menu, set the “Symbol Search Path For Analysis” to SRV*c:\websymbols*http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols

4. In the Advanced Analysis tab, select Add Data Files, add your memory dump, select the DotNetMemoryAnalysis.asp script and click Start Analysis  (note that some of the steps may take a while depending on the size of the dump).  If you get an InStr exception that means that you are either trying to debug a 64 bit dump or the sos version in your framework directory is not matching up to the framework version of the dump (i.e. the proper mscordacwks symbol could not be found)

Once the analysis is done you will be presented with a mhtm file containing the report.

Sample report:

Here is a sample report generated for a dump taken for Lab 3 where the finalizer is blocked because of some bad code in the destructor for the Link object.

For this example we can see already from the analysis summary that something is fishy with the finalizer, and in the finalizer section we can also see the finalizer stack.

Scrolling down to the 40 most memory consuming object types we find a lot of Link/Link_aspx and System.Web.UI… objects, so in this case the report is pretty much straight on.  In other cases it might be a bit less obvious but hopefully the suggested articles help narrow it down. 


Analysis Summary
Type Description Recommendation
warning   Warning Number of objects ready for finalization: 35765
This is an indication that your finalizer thread may be blocked. Look at finalizequeue info and finalizer stack to determine why/if the finalizer is blocked
information   Information Cache Size: 1397928 Bytes

This includes memory for objects stored in in-process sessions
information   Information Number of active in-process sessions: 4000  
information   Information GC Heap usage: 768160596 Bytes

Common issues for high .NET Memory usage includes: Blocked finalizers, lots of memory in cache/sessions, lots of large objects and memory rooted in statics
You should also revivew the most memory consuming objects.

Analysis Details



Type of Analysis Performed   .NET Memory Analysis
Machine Name   PRATHER
Operating System   Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2
Number Of Processors   2
Process ID   5476
Process Image   C:\WINDOWS\SysWOW64\inetsrv\w3wp.exe
System Up-Time   10 day(s) 05:48:21
Process Up-Time   8 day(s) 23:15:06

Table of contents

.NET Framework Version
.NET GC Heap Information
40 most memory consuming .NET object types
.NET Finalizer Queue
Large Object Heap

.NET Version

2.0.50727.3053 retail
Server mode with 2 gc heaps
SOS Version: 2.0.50727.3053 retail build

.NET GC Heap Information

Number of GC Heaps: 2
Heap 0 (001aa5c0)
generation 0 starts at 0x39d0c6a8
generation 1 starts at 0x39005c0c
generation 2 starts at 0x02d10038
ephemeral segment allocation context: none
segment begin allocated size
02d10000 02d10038 06cf1098 0x03fe1060(66981984)
16fd0000 16fd0038 1afca200 0x03ffa1c8(67084744)
1efd0000 1efd0038 22fc61f0 0x03ff61b8(67068344)
26fd0000 26fd0038 2afc1338 0x03ff1300(67048192)
2efd0000 2efd0038 32e7c290 0x03eac258(65716824)
36fd0000 36fd0038 3a0e7734 0x031176fc(51476220)
Large object heap starts at 0x0ad10038
segment begin allocated size
0ad10000 0ad10038 0ad23b78 0x00013b40(80704)
Heap Size 0x16f99b74(385457012)
Heap 1 (001ab888)
generation 0 starts at 0x3de2921c
generation 1 starts at 0x3d17acc8
generation 2 starts at 0x06d10038
ephemeral segment allocation context: none
segment begin allocated size
06d10000 06d10038 0acfe46c 0x03fee434(67036212)
1afd0000 1afd0038 1efaba04 0x03fdb9cc(66959820)
22fd0000 22fd0038 26fa3d7c 0x03fd3d44(66927940)
2afd0000 2afd0038 2efa58d8 0x03fd58a0(66934944)
32fd0000 32fd0038 36c42aa8 0x03c72a70(63384176)
3afd0000 3afd0038 3e0e39b4 0x0311397c(51460476)
Large object heap starts at 0x0cd10038
segment begin allocated size
0cd10000 0cd10038 0cd10048 0x00000010(16)
Heap Size 0x16cf97e0(382703584)
GC Heap Size 0x2dc93354(768160596)
More information:
Compare the total GC Heap size to the number of private bytes in the process when the dump was taken (or the dump size on disk) to determine if most of your memory is on the .NET GC Heap

In the !eeheap -gc output above you can also see if most of your .NET GC memory is on the small object heaps or on the large object heap (LOH) (objects over 85000 bytes). If you see that most of your memory is on the LOH, look at the
LOH output to see what those objects are.

If the GC Heap is relatively small, run debug diag with leaktracking to track native leaks and analyze the dump with the MemoryAnalysis script instead. See debug diag help for more information about this.

Related posts:
I have a memory leak!!! What do i do? (defining the "where")
Are you really leaking .NET Memory?

40 most memory consuming .NET object types

MT      Num items    Tot. size Type
66108d24 33 8316 System.Web.UI.RenderStyle[]
6614e4dc 35 8540 System.Web.Hosting.ISAPIWorkerRequestInProcForIIS6
79323510 363 8712 System.Collections.Stack+StackEnumerator
7932e7d0 185 8880 System.Signature
79331a6c 472 9440 System.RuntimeType
648c710c 636 10176 System.Configuration.PropertySourceInfo
66108884 33 10956 System.Web.UI.HtmlTextWriter+RenderAttribute[]
7a5eca44 576 11520 System.Collections.Specialized.HybridDictionary
79304314 194 11640 System.Reflection.ParameterInfo
7932fba8 215 12040 System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo
0fbf1b90 35 13020 ASP.links_aspx
661087a0 593 14232 System.Web.UI.ControlCollection+ControlCollectionEnumerator
66107950 941 15056 System.Web.UI.Pair
648c8fa0 299 15548 System.Configuration.ConfigurationProperty
79329b58 496 15872 System.EventHandler
7933151c 232 16400 System.Char[]
7a5ecbc0 829 16580 System.Collections.Specialized.ListDictionary+DictionaryNode
648c91d4 353 16944 System.Configuration.ConfigurationValues
66113834 759 18216 System.Web.UI.Html32TextWriter+FontStackItem
79332a88 243 18484 System.Int32[]
79332b38 1627 19524 System.Int32
7a5e7dbc 1329 21264 System.Collections.Specialized.NameObjectCollectionBase+NameObjectEntry
66106ba4 315 21420 System.Web.UI.DataBoundLiteralControl
66101cd0 630 22680 System.Web.UI.ControlCollection
66101934 379 22740 System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
648c9414 1147 22940 System.Configuration.ConfigurationValue
7933335c 232 26484 System.Byte[]
661068d4 385 35420 System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataListItem
66101680 945 41580 System.Web.UI.Control+OccasionalFields
7933291c 1869 44856 System.Collections.ArrayList
79332f40 910 50960 System.Collections.Hashtable
661493a4 33 51084 System.Web.Caching.ExpiresEntry[]
6611b000 4000 192000 System.Web.SessionState.InProcSessionState
793040bc 4141 284380 System.Object[]
66148eb0 4026 289872 System.Web.Caching.CacheEntry
7933303c 948 349560 System.Collections.Hashtable+bucket[]
0fbf1edc 35999 575984 Link
79330a28 36165 723300 System.Text.StringBuilder
001a9a30 6028 43134680 Free
793308ec 47536 721577968 System.String
Total 168583 objects´
Color Object type
Red System.Web.UI... objects
Blue System.Data... objects
Green System.XML... objects
Purple Custom objects
More Information
For more information on how to read !dumpheap -stat output, see
!dumpheap -stat explained

To get info on how to dig deeper into the !dumpheap -stat output see
ASP.NET Memory Investigation

Finalizer queue

SyncBlocks to be cleaned up: 0
MTA Interfaces to be released: 0
STA Interfaces to be released: 0
Heap 0
generation 0 has 370 finalizable objects (107a9a9c->107aa064)
generation 1 has 12 finalizable objects (107a9a6c->107a9a9c)
generation 2 has 47 finalizable objects (107a99b0->107a9a6c)
Ready for finalization 17909 objects (107aa064->107bb838)
Heap 1
generation 0 has 247 finalizable objects (107bcb40->107bcf1c)
generation 1 has 4 finalizable objects (107bcb30->107bcb40)
generation 2 has 36 finalizable objects (107bcaa0->107bcb30)
Ready for finalization 17856 objects (107bcf1c->107ce61c)
MT Count TotalSize Class Name
6614bbc0 1 12 System.Web.Configuration.ImpersonateTokenRef
79334808 1 20 Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeFileMappingHandle
793347b0 1 20 Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeViewOfFileHandle
79317fac 1 20 Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeTokenHandle
66147c6c 1 20 System.Web.PerfInstanceDataHandle
6614b038 1 32 System.Web.Compilation.CompilationMutex
7932335c 2 40 System.Security.Cryptography.SafeProvHandle
6612f6d0 2 56 System.Web.Security.FileSecurityDescriptorWrapper
79317928 3 60 Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeWaitHandle
79321cd0 2 120 System.Runtime.Remoting.Contexts.Context
7932a0f4 3 132 System.Threading.ReaderWriterLock
79316fb0 7 168 System.Threading.TimerBase
7932b108 14 280 Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeRegistryHandle
661483d8 10 280 System.Web.DirMonCompletion
7932a09c 31 496 System.WeakReference
66151384 70 1680 System.Web.HttpResponseUnmanagedBufferElement
66148130 96 1920 System.Web.ApplicationImpersonationContext
66151404 100 2000 System.Web.ClientImpersonationContext
66103cb4 68 2992 System.Web.UI.WebControls.TableStyle
79330ec0 78 4368 System.Threading.Thread
0fbf1edc 35989 575824 Link
Total 36481 objects

More Information:
!finalizequeue will show all the objects on the heap that have finalizer methods, and have yet not been disposed of. It is a good idea to look through this list and verify that all your "custom" objects on this list really need finalizers/destructors, as having unneccesary finalizers will lead to higher memory consumption and a potential for blocked finalizers.

Related posts:
Unblock my finalizer
To dispose or not to dispose, that's the 1 GB question

As the number of finalizable objects is more than 0, please check the finalizer thread to see if it is blocked or active

Finalizer Thread

OS Thread Id: 0x1534 (14)
0286f8f4 7d61ccc6 [HelperMethodFrame: 0286f8f4] System.Threading.Thread.SleepInternal(Int32)
0286f948 79299225 System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(Int32)
0286f94c 0fbe2262 Link.Finalize()
0286fc1c 79f8df9a [ContextTransitionFrame: 0286fc1c]
0286fcec 79f8df9a [GCFrame: 0286fcec]

Objects on the Large Object Heap

Heap 0
Address MT Size
total 0 objects
Heap 1
Address MT Size
total 0 objects
total 0 objects
MT Count TotalSize Class Name
Total 0 objects
More information:
A high amount of large objects (strings and arrays over 85000 bytes) can lead to GC Heap fragmentation and thus higher memory usage in your application.
Look through the large objects, to dig deeper you can run !do on the object address in windbg, to see if these objects are expected and if you can minimize their usage in any way, by caching etc.
Common reasons for high amounts of large objects are
large viewstate and Dataset serialization

Size of Web Caches in the process

sizeof(06d1cd2c) =      1397928 (    0x1554a8) bytes (System.Web.Caching.Cache)
More information:
There is one System.Web.Caching.Cache object referencing all cached objects, per web application
In-Proc session state is stored in the cache, so the size of all session vars is also included in the size of the cache for the specific application

Related articles
How much are you caching
UI objects in session scope

Script Summary
Script Name Status Error Code Error Source Error Description Source Line
DotNetMemoryAnalysis.asp Completed  








Have fun,


Attachment: DotNetMemoryAnalysis.zip
  • PingBack from http://asp-net-hosting.simplynetdev.com/debug-diag-script-for-troubleshooting-net-20-memory-leaks/

  • Thank you for submitting this cool story - Trackback from DotNetShoutout

  • I have put together a quick and dirty debug diag script for troubleshooting .net memory leaks. (attached

  • If you are looking to follow this series, be sure to subscribe to my RSS feed at http://feeds.jasongaylord

  • If you are looking to follow this series, be sure to subscribe to my RSS feed at http://feeds.jasongaylord.com/JasonNGaylord

  • Web The Evolution of a Website Design Twitter from ASP.NET IIS 7 Tip # 10 You can generate machine keys

  • WebTheEvolutionofaWebsiteDesignTwitterfromASP.NETIIS7Tip#10Youcangenera...

  • When the .NET Framework was first released, many developers believed the introduction of the garbage

  • Tess,

    Good Morning ...

    Really Cool Stuff

    Couple of suggestion:

    1) Can you show the process size

    2) Showing whether Debug is set to true

    3) Lastly showing the no. in MB instead of bytes (bytes looks scary at first look)


    Cache Size: 1397928 Bytes

    Cache Size: 1.3 MB



  • When the .NET Framework was first released, many developers believed the introduction of the garbage

  • When the .NET Framework was first released, many developers believed the introduction of the garbage

  • Hi Tess,

    This is really great and very usefull.

    I second jaskis thoughts on shosing few more details(Debug Status, Process Size and if possible showing the size in MB's)



  • Tess you are already my hero, but I would like to third the suggestion to add Debug flag information to the script. JITOptimizerDisabled; IsJITTrackingEnabled;web.config and machine.config text checks <3

  • Hi Tess,

    Great post. I was looking for some automated way to perform a basic memory analysis.

    I have run this script on two w3wp process dumps. I process had total size of 721MB and GC Heap size was 345 MB (Difference of 376MB)

    Other process dumps was taken with /3GB switch and had a size of 1.27GB, and GC Heap size was 910MB (Difference of 390MB)

    I wanted to know your opinion on is this some thing acceptable or process is prone to native memory leaks.



  • Nitin,

    It's hard to say if a given number is "ok" or not, it completely depends on what you do in in the app.  

    If you are looking to find out if you have a native memory leak, you should really look at if the native part is growing or not (process\private bytes - .net clr memory\#Bytes in all heaps in perfmon).

    In your case here you have the same difference whether your process is 712 MB or 1.27 GB and you can clearly see that the increase in memory = increase in .net memory, so here i would definitely say, just concentrate on the .net stuff.

Page 1 of 2 (27 items) 12
Leave a Comment
  • Please add 6 and 1 and type the answer here:
  • Post