<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>How did the collection of Anonymous Types work?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/timng/archive/2007/05/27/how-did-the-collection-of-anonymous-types-work.aspx</link><description>In my last post on Making Collections of Anonymous Types , I demonstrated how to create anonymous type collections by using a generic method as a "blueprint" factory method. Today, I will describe how this works, and conclude that it might not be a good</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>VB 2008 Language Deep Dive - Presentation Materials (Jonathan Aneja)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/timng/archive/2007/05/27/how-did-the-collection-of-anonymous-types-work.aspx#8883444</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:03:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8883444</guid><dc:creator>The Visual Basic Team</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week I got the chance to visit the Toronto .NET User Group and give a talk on all the great new&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8883444" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: How did the collection of Anonymous Types work?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/timng/archive/2007/05/27/how-did-the-collection-of-anonymous-types-work.aspx#2982820</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 09:57:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2982820</guid><dc:creator>Timothy Ng</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Bill for pointing out my mistake; I've corrected it in the blog.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2982820" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: How did the collection of Anonymous Types work?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/timng/archive/2007/05/27/how-did-the-collection-of-anonymous-types-work.aspx#2981341</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 08:25:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2981341</guid><dc:creator>Bill_McC</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;dUde you didn't really write this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dim x = New With {.Name = &amp;quot;Square&amp;quot;, .Sides = 4}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dim y = New With {.Name = &amp;quot;Triangle&amp;quot;, .Sides = 3}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Debug.Assert(x.GetType() == y.GetType())&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;did you ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2981341" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>