<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Hyper-V: SCSI vs IDE - Do you really need an IDE and SCSI drive for best performance?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/tvoellm/archive/2008/01/02/hyper-v-scsi-vs-ide-do-you-really-need-an-ide-and-scsi-drive-for-best-performance.aspx</link><description>Wow... blogging is fun and can really help people understand a topic. Other times it can be a chore when the whole picture is not presented up front. This is just what I did in a previous post http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Hyper-V: SCSI vs IDE - Do you really need an IDE and SCSI drive for best performance?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/tvoellm/archive/2008/01/02/hyper-v-scsi-vs-ide-do-you-really-need-an-ide-and-scsi-drive-for-best-performance.aspx#9931127</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9931127</guid><dc:creator>Brandon Stricker</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I did some testing recently with Hyper-V on Windows Server 2008 R2 and found no major performance differences when it came to IDE vs SCSI. My article here (&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.nodnarb.net/post.aspx?id=7ee1331a-5042-474d-8aa9-508296b30e27"&gt;http://www.nodnarb.net/post.aspx?id=7ee1331a-5042-474d-8aa9-508296b30e27&lt;/a&gt;) details my methods and results, if anyone out there is interested. I hope it's helpful.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9931127" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V Storage</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/tvoellm/archive/2008/01/02/hyper-v-scsi-vs-ide-do-you-really-need-an-ide-and-scsi-drive-for-best-performance.aspx#8897141</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:14:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8897141</guid><dc:creator>Dario IT Solutions Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Virtualization terminology Before we start, I wanted to define some terms commonly used in virtualization&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8897141" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V: SCSI vs IDE - Do you really need an IDE and SCSI drive for best performance?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/tvoellm/archive/2008/01/02/hyper-v-scsi-vs-ide-do-you-really-need-an-ide-and-scsi-drive-for-best-performance.aspx#8746247</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:55:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8746247</guid><dc:creator>John Chen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Why not just tell us directly that Hyper-V can NOT boot from scsi? A production server boots from IDE. Sounds like we are still in 90s. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8746247" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>