<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Option Strict [On|Off|SortOf]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vbteam/archive/2007/09/25/option-strict-custom.aspx</link><description>Yesterday I got a question from a developer asking whether or not we could add something called "Option Strict Warn" to the language. This would give a developer a warning when using something like late binding or an implicit conversion, rather than disabling</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>まあまあ厳しくして欲しい (1/3) ～Option Strict SortOfって？～</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vbteam/archive/2007/09/25/option-strict-custom.aspx#8519207</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:15:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8519207</guid><dc:creator>とりこらぼ。</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;まあまあ厳しくして欲しい (1/3) ～Option Strict SortOfって？～&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8519207" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>まあまあ厳しくして欲しい (2/3) ～Option Strict に関連する３つの条件～</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vbteam/archive/2007/09/25/option-strict-custom.aspx#5811447</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:13:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5811447</guid><dc:creator>とりこびと ぶろぐ。</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;まあまあ厳しくして欲しい (2/3) ～Option Strict に関連する３つの条件～&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5811447" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>まあまあ厳しくして欲しい (1/3) ～Option Strict SortOfって？～</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vbteam/archive/2007/09/25/option-strict-custom.aspx#5811026</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:31:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5811026</guid><dc:creator>とりこびと ぶろぐ。</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;まあまあ厳しくして欲しい (1/3) ～Option Strict SortOfって？～&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5811026" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Option Strict [On|Off|SortOf]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vbteam/archive/2007/09/25/option-strict-custom.aspx#5663384</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:14:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5663384</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Hall</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;On the same theme - customizable compiler options for treatment of error status - I have been looking for a way to override the compiler abort after 100 errors have been reported. &amp;nbsp;I realize that there is a problem in many cases with an initial error causing a storm of secondary errors to no good end, but in this case I would like to assess the amount of errors generated when trying to compile an output from the VB6 to VB.NET conversion &amp;quot;wizard&amp;quot; before starting to integrate it into already converted source. Unfortunately the compiler gives up before completing this task, which hinders my being able to quantify the number of compilation errors needing attention.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5663384" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>