<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Hyper-V, Virtual Machine CPU usage and Task Manager</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2008/02/28/hyper-v-virtual-machine-cpu-usage-and-task-manager.aspx</link><description>A number of people have asked me about the fact that the CPU usage reported on the Hyper-V Management console does not match the CPU usage reported under task manager.&amp;#160; The answer to this is fairly complicated - so I thought it would make a good</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Hyper-V, Virtual Machine CPU usage and Task Manager</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2008/02/28/hyper-v-virtual-machine-cpu-usage-and-task-manager.aspx#10301747</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 10:11:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10301747</guid><dc:creator>changming.dong</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encounter a more difficult problem, my environment is a resource monitoring in the failover cluster in Windows 2008 R2, through sub-partition to complete the partition of this sub?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the only monitor in the parent partition, then it would be a very bad problem, because the child partition will drift, unable to confirm the sub-partition in which the parent partition&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10301747" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V, Virtual Machine CPU usage and Task Manager</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2008/02/28/hyper-v-virtual-machine-cpu-usage-and-task-manager.aspx#8201965</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:12:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8201965</guid><dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ben,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you have any suggestions regarding monitoring disk subsystem monitoring? For example if my child guest machines are actually on a SAN, where would be the best place to monitor disk performance for the child?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Richard&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8201965" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V, Virtual Machine CPU usage and Task Manager</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2008/02/28/hyper-v-virtual-machine-cpu-usage-and-task-manager.aspx#8007017</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:05:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8007017</guid><dc:creator>David Williams</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You'll actually find the same case with VMWare. &amp;nbsp;IMHO, people should not keep looking at Virtual Guests the same as they do as physical machines. &amp;nbsp;Another item in addition to CPU/Memory is Time, since the processor on a guest is not always active then time can become a problem keeping in true sync which can cause issues with real-time/time sensitive applications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8007017" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V, Virtual Machine CPU usage and Task Manager</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2008/02/28/hyper-v-virtual-machine-cpu-usage-and-task-manager.aspx#7996100</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 08:51:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7996100</guid><dc:creator>Srinivasan S Saripalli</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;any good samples regarding WMI,VirtualServer and Visual C++&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7996100" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V, Virtual Machine CPU usage and Task Manager</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2008/02/28/hyper-v-virtual-machine-cpu-usage-and-task-manager.aspx#7964746</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:23:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7964746</guid><dc:creator>Duncan McAlynn</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ben,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Love reading your posts! Thanks for the great info!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My only question about this explanation of the differences between the two is if it's that complicated and doesn't show the true values in near real-time, then why not use a scale (i.e. Great, Good, OK, Poor, Critical). Just a thought. Perhaps then, it could be more manageable and more reflective. Then, we can pop over and see what threads are causing the Poor rating. Again, just a thought.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Duncan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7964746" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V, Virtual Machine CPU usage and Task Manager</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2008/02/28/hyper-v-virtual-machine-cpu-usage-and-task-manager.aspx#7955350</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:12:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7955350</guid><dc:creator>Ido Samuelson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds like a bad explenation for a bug. I just hope it doesn't hide a serious design nor archiecture problem in Hyper-V. Time will tell though...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7955350" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V, Virtual Machine CPU usage and Task Manager</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2008/02/28/hyper-v-virtual-machine-cpu-usage-and-task-manager.aspx#7938937</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:16:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7938937</guid><dc:creator>Pontus Blomqvist</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The first part of the answer is that when you run Task Manager in the parent partition (remembering that it is &amp;quot;just another partition on the system&amp;quot;) it knows nothing about CPU usage that is happening in the hypervisor or in child partitions&amp;quot;. Is it the same way for RAM? I can clearly see all my 4 GB of RAM on my laptop with Hyper-V. What is the differens between CPU and RAM with parent partition and Hyper-V?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7938937" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>