<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Confusion over Multi-Processor Guest OS Support with Hyper-V</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2008/07/14/confusion-over-multi-processor-guest-os-support-with-hyper-v.aspx</link><description>After posting a link to our supported guest operating system list ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/954958/en-us ) I have received a number of queries about the issue of multi-processor support.&amp;#160; You see, while we state that we only support Windows</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Confusion over Multi-Processor Guest OS Support with Hyper-V</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2008/07/14/confusion-over-multi-processor-guest-os-support-with-hyper-v.aspx#8750171</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:52:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8750171</guid><dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The word &amp;quot;support&amp;quot; has really become diluted with the open-source community, which has appropriated the word to mean &amp;quot;it works.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;I sort of feel that every time Microsoft uses &amp;quot;support,&amp;quot; the word should be highlighted and link to a definition which clarifies the difference between &amp;quot;supports&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;works.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8750171" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Confusion over Multi-Processor Guest OS Support with Hyper-V</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2008/07/14/confusion-over-multi-processor-guest-os-support-with-hyper-v.aspx#8742470</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:52:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8742470</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Armstrong</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;John - &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good question, let me post on that another day :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8742470" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Confusion over Multi-Processor Guest OS Support with Hyper-V</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2008/07/14/confusion-over-multi-processor-guest-os-support-with-hyper-v.aspx#8738134</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:51:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8738134</guid><dc:creator>John Paul Cook</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What about licensing issues? Isn't retail XP licensed for 1-2 processors? What if four virtual processors are allocated to it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8738134" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>