Sign In
Vista Compatibility Team Blog
Translate This Page
Translate this page
Powered by
Microsoft® Translator
Options
Email Blog Author
RSS for posts
Atom
RSS for comments
OK
Search
Advanced search options...
Search In:
Everything
Blogs
Forums
People
Groups
Places
Pages
Date range:
All Time
Last Year
Last 6 Months
Last 3 Months
Last Month
Last Week
Last Two Days
Tags
Vista application compatibility XP port
Windows Vista Application Compatibilty XP port
windows Vista Application Compatibilty XP port dllhost session 0
windows Vista Application Compatibilty XP port MSI sign certificate installer
Archive
Archives
June 2008
(1)
June 2007
(4)
May 2007
(1)
April 2007
(6)
February 2007
(3)
January 2007
(2)
December 2006
(3)
November 2006
(1)
October 2006
(9)
September 2006
(7)
October, 2006
MSDN Blogs
>
Vista Compatibility Team Blog
>
October, 2006
Posts
Subscribe via RSS
Sort by:
Most Recent
|
Most Views
|
Most Comments
Excerpt View
|
Full Post View
Vista Compatibility Team Blog
Mark and Manmeet on .Net Show
Posted
over 6 years ago
by
MSDNArchive
0
Comments
Mark and Manmeet appeared on the .Net show last week. Enjoy: http://msdn.microsoft.com/theshow/episode.aspx?xml=theshow/en/episode059/manifest.xml Maarten
Vista Compatibility Team Blog
MSI uninstall gives unsigned dialog
Posted
over 6 years ago
by
MSDNArchive
4
Comments
This week we again had the honor of getting the expert advise of one of the Windows Installer PMs ( here and here ). He mentioned that when uninstalling a signed msi package you still get the scary this-package-is-unsigned dialog. Reason is that the installer...
Vista Compatibility Team Blog
rundll32.exe appwiz.cpl,NewlInkHere is back
Posted
over 6 years ago
by
MSDNArchive
2
Comments
For some reason it was quite common to use an undocumented (and hence unsupported and we-can-pull-rug-underneath-at-any-time) export from the appwiz.cpl called newlinkhere. This export was removed in Vista. Since this was quite a popular export (live...
Vista Compatibility Team Blog
Session 0 isolation, COM and COM+
Posted
over 6 years ago
by
MSDNArchive
1
Comments
Session 0 isolation is not limited to NT services. It also applies to COM+ server applications and COM out-of-process applications running under anything else than the interactive user. So all problems related to services living in a different Terminal...
Vista Compatibility Team Blog
Impact of Least Privilege in System Services
Posted
over 6 years ago
by
MSDNArchive
6
Comments
Of all security changes in Vista, UAC with its spit token and MIC is for obvious reasons getting most attention. But there are a lot of other areas that have been tightened up for security reasons and we keep finding new ones that impact customers. One...
Vista Compatibility Team Blog
Per-User COM on Vista for elevated token processes
Posted
over 6 years ago
by
MSDNArchive
3
Comments
Per-user COM in Vista (where CLSIDs, etc. go under HKCU\Software\Classes instead of HKLM\Software\Classes) behaves different on Vista compared to XP. Actually it does not work at all for full administrators (to be precise, it is actually for any process...
Vista Compatibility Team Blog
Why you don't want to launch a process with a filtered token from a full token
Posted
over 6 years ago
by
MSDNArchive
0
Comments
Our team works extensively with ISVs on Vista application compatibility – porting XP applications to Windows Vista. We frequently get the question "How can I launch a program with a filtered token from a program with a full token?" Although there sure...
Vista Compatibility Team Blog
Command line application with manifest asInvoker
Posted
over 6 years ago
by
MSDNArchive
1
Comments
The recommendation for command line applications is to use requestedExecutionLevel=asInvoker in the manifest. If you would mark your console application as “requireAdministrator” (or “highestAvailable” and you are a member of the administrators group...
Vista Compatibility Team Blog
Elevation and process creation APIs
Posted
over 6 years ago
by
MSDNArchive
4
Comments
In Vista, process creation APIs behave very differently with respect to UAC. If you call CreateProcess() on an executable which is manifested as “RequireAdministrator” or is flagged as an installer by Vista, you will get back an ERROR_ELEVATION_REQUIRED...
Page 1 of 1 (9 items)