<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>PDC05: Designing Managed Add-ins</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vsta/archive/2005/10/29/486850.aspx</link><description>The Managed Add-in Framework (MAF) is a new part of WinFX ( System.addins) and is the foundation that enables Visual Studio Tools for Applications to have version resilient add-ins. Watch TQ , the VSTA and VSTO architect and Jim Miller an architect on</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: PDC05: Designing Managed Add-ins</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vsta/archive/2005/10/29/486850.aspx#518862</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:08:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:518862</guid><dc:creator>Dasher</dc:creator><description>Kinda quiet on the VSTA Project blog :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's interesting to see the demos about the MAF but what's happening in the space of embedding scripting support (C#, VB, etc) into applications?&lt;br&gt;IronPython appears to be the only MS based scripting engine that implements an interface that allows it to be integrated into applications as a scripting engine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Additionally - the plugin framework available within VS appears to be robust and stable - how does this differ from what will be provided by the MAF?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the update.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=518862" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>