<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>TFS Integration Platform – Explicit versus Implicit field mapping in the config … huh? Question &amp; Answer 21</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/willy-peter_schaub/archive/2010/01/21/tfs-integration-platform-explicit-versus-implicit-field-mapping-in-the-config-pls-elaborate-question-answer-21.aspx</link><description>Special thanks to Terry and Huyng from the TFS Integration Platform team for input and reviewing of this post! 
 First of all let us clarify the difference between implicit and explicit in the context of field mapping, because this on its own has numbed</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator></channel></rss>