http://blogs.msdn.com/b/wriju/archive/2007/10/26/c-3-0-anonymous-type-and-net-reflection-hand-in-hand.aspxAnonymous Type is nothing but the type which gets defined by CLR (not you). So that type is as rich as any other normal type. Probably the conventional way to find the components of an Anonymous Type through reflection would be clearer to us, staticenTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/wriju/archive/2007/10/26/c-3-0-anonymous-type-and-net-reflection-hand-in-hand.aspx#5916067Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:02:48 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5916067Charlie Calvert's Community Blog<p>Welcome to the thirty-fifth edition of Community Convergence. This week we have an interview with C#</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5916067" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/wriju/archive/2007/10/26/c-3-0-anonymous-type-and-net-reflection-hand-in-hand.aspx#5684075Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:10:33 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5684075MSDN Blog Postings » C# 3.0 : Anonymous Type and .NET Reflection Hand-in-Hand<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2007/10/25/c-30-anonymous-type-and-net-reflection-hand-in-hand/">http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2007/10/25/c-30-anonymous-type-and-net-reflection-hand-in-hand/</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5684075" width="1" height="1">